User talk:Mwanga

Hi Mwanga,

I think this study is important and should be included in all articles dealing with sub-saharan Africa. The sub-saharan origins of the Greeks, which differentiates them from other Mediterranean groups. Thanks.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11260506

Some contributors are trying to impose on African continent a supremacist and racist regionalization and do not want different sources about what other peoples think about the term. The term is artificial. It is not a physics constant or formula and it causes heated debates in Africa.

The paper you are talking about is a work of some researchers. Nothing proves that what they say is recognised by the entire scientific community. For example you know the discussion that is out there on evolution.

December 2008
Hi

You can say whatever you want about people origins. I think that we are currently told that the entire humanity originated from East Africa. So it is not Greeks only. According to your theory you can add Eskimo, Sub Saharan Africans, Greenlandish, Japanese, Chinese, Indians, Russians, British, Irish, Jewish, Arabs, Spanish, Germans, French, Scandinavians, Italians... Hi, the recent edit you made to Sub-Saharan Africa has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - &#10032; ALLSTAR &#10032; echo 05:19, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Sub-Saharan Africa constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. - &#10032; ALLSTAR &#10032; echo 05:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sub-Saharan Africa. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. - &#10032; ALLSTAR &#10032; echo 05:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Drmaik (talk) 05:42, 30 January 2008 (UTC)