User talk:Mwestrick1/sandbox

This is where the peer review feedback for Mwestrick1's sandbox draft content should be posted. Be sure to sign your post and complete the Canvas quiz to receive credit for your work. UWM.AP.Endo (talk) 04:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Lantrell review of this sandbox
Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? Yes.

Are the citations formatted correctly? No.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? Yes, the author gave recognition of multiple contraceptives and side effects.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? Yes, but I think the contribution is detailed and has valuable information. Lantrell0101 (talk) 04:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Erika review of this sandbox
Peer review questions

Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? Yes

Are the citations formatted correctly? No.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? I don't necessarily believe so. They is an extensive section that reviews the types of birth control; the contributions in the sandbox do not add anything the article did not already have. I do think that the side effects part was good.. maybe this should be the focus?

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? The "effects" section could be added to. Adding more contributing information to the biological side effects of birth control would be advantageous. (This section is minimal and did not include the information you included in your contribution).

Erikareneej1998 (talk) 03:15, 23 November 2020 (UTC)erikareneej1998