User talk:Mwilliams087

Calchasm
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Calchasm, and it appears to be a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 05:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Calchasm
A template has been added to the article Calchasm, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Elenseel 05:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Brownbrokers
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Brownbrokers, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.brown.edu/Departments/Theatre_Speech_Dance/about/brownbrokers.html. As a copyright violation, Brownbrokers appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Brownbrokers has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Brownbrokers and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Brownbrokers with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Brownbrokers.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 20:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Brownbrokers, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Ol Yeller '''Talktome 20:52, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

November 2011
Your addition to Brownbrokers has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Filing Flunky (talk) 19:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi there. I'm confused about why my pictures were removed. Both are in my possession and taken by me (one is a scanned copy of a photo I owned). I wanted to add them to WikiCommons and put them in the public domain. Please advise! Thank you!

Mwilliams087 (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Michael

I also wanted to change the name to ""Brownbrokers (Brown University)"" to clarify that it is a University-affiliated producing body.

Mwilliams087 (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Michael


 * I'm not sure about the pictures as I can't see their history now but I'm guessing that by putting them up on the website you originally did, you donated them to that copyrighted source meaning that they can't also be donated here unless the original source changes their license of them. That's something you would have to work out with them.
 * The page move isn't warranted and doesn't particularly follow the naming guideline that was linked in the edit summary but I don't really care to change it. The only thing it will do is make it slightly harder to find your page.
 * There are two problems that I'd like to bring to your attention, though. As a new editor, I'm sure you aren't intimately familiar with the plethora of WP guidelines and policies and no one really expects you to be at this point.  The first thing I wanted to point out is that you removed several improvement templates from the article without an explanation and without explicitly addressing the issues they mention.  Doing this repeatedly can result in being blocked but as this I'm guessing this isn't something you're aware of, you're in no trouble.  The second issue is that you never use an edit summary.  There's a box just below the edit box (the one you edit content in) where comments can be left.  This is helpful, especially when making large changes to an article, to make notes as to what you're doing.  You don't have to leave a note every single time but even a short note like "reply" or "fixing date" or "adding ref" can be very useful.  Otherwise, the edit history of the page looks like it does; a large list of edits that have to be gone through one-by-one to asses what has been done.  You can read more about edit summaries at HELP:Edit summary.
 * I'm going to reapply the improvement templates as they'll alert other editors who specialize in those areas that the article can be improved. If you'd like to remove them, please start a discussion on the talk page of the article before doing so.  That way, other editors can discuss the removal to try and make the article the best it can be.
 * If you have any questions not related to the content of the article, feel free to leave a message here or on my talk page and I'll do my best to help out.  Ol Yeller21 Talktome  21:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)