User talk:Mwiner

January 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Legal threats. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:16, 18 January 2019 (UTC)


 * User:Yamla they have not rescinded the legal threats but emailed them a number of times to my university. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 15:39, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Really?!? Well, that pretty much guarantees we'll never unblock this person. --Yamla (talk) 22:46, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Administrators%27_noticeboard
is a matter concerning you. You may respond here and ask that your response be carried there if you remain blocked.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 04:19, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

I'm responding here because I'm blocked on the main page. James Heilman (he posted his name in his bio so I'm not doxxing him (as he did me)) is trying to appropriate Wikipedia for his own designs. From his profile page: "He encourages other clinicians to contribute to the online encyclopedia." You see that he wants clinicians to edit Wikipedia. He marked my first attempt to list Venlafaxine as an opioid as "vandalism" despite the fact that I provided multiple resources and references from the authoritative "PubMed". A few edits go by and I got frustrated. Yes, I did email him and threaten him legally. I admit that. Now that I see how Wikipedia works, I renounce that legal threat. But if you're going to deny me the courts, you have to implement justice here. Heilman (Doc James) wants only dogmatic medical sources to be the source of medical information.

I am trying to warn the public of the dangers of an antidepressant 'Venlafaxine'. I have had 6 years of my life destroyed by this OPIOID. James doesn't want anyone to list Venlafaxine as an opioid because it's counter to 'medical dogma'. The spirit of Wikipedia is to allow authors and editors of all backgrounds access. The theory is that people from across multiple disciplines will create content superior to a dogmatic Encyclopedia. As you can see from his profile... Heilman wants to turn Wikipedia into Pubmed where only physicians can post and/or those that do post can only post content acceptable to physicians. Heilman: Get this through your head... Wikipedia is NOT for physicians only. If you want that, go to pubmed.

This is an editorial bias contrary to Wikipedia's founding principles. Wikipedia is a place -- uniquely so -- that should allow content from all disciplines and all editors.

Heilman has been nothing but abusive to me. He marked my content as 'vanadalism' instead of looking at it. Then he proceeded to block me and continue to block me at every possible opportunity. He allowed for no input, no discussion. I think it's Doc James who should be blocked from editing the Venlafaxine article. He clearly has a heavily dogmatic medical bias. I ask a 'higher editor' to please block Doc James from overseeing the Venlafaxine page. He's ruining Wikipedia and there's already Pubmed for him to write to and oversee.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:36, 19 January 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 03:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 05:24, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * As you are using this talk page essentially just to carry out a continuing attack on User:Doc James, I have revoked your ability to edit it - consider it my attempt to help you avoid digging yourself in any deeper. Whoever reviews your unblock request is welcome to reinstate that ability should they wish. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:36, 19 January 2019 (UTC)