User talk:Mwpiper/sandbox

I am reviewing the article about Thérèse Casgrain.

'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? All of the information was relevant.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, it does not seem biased.

'''Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I do not feel as if Casgrain's viewpoint is represented well. The article doesn't give a good account of what her ideas and beliefs were even though she had very revolutionary thoughts. She even wrote her autobiography and there is no quotation of reference to what her beliefs and goals were.

'''Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Out of 8 references, two of them do not work, and one of them goes to the wrong page.

'''Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Most of the article is not cited. Very important information with dates and names are not cited. The references that are there and that do work are reliable.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? There is a lot of information that is missing. Although it mentions that she was a senator, there is no information on the work she did as a senator, or her political positions. There is also a whole 10 years of her life that is not metioned between her retirement and her death where she was still very active and involved in politics and her community. The article mentions the various organizations she started but fails to say what these organizations did, or any information other than the name. It also fails to mention her book that she wrote or even that she was an author. Finally, the article has no mention of the Thérèse F.-Casgrain Fellowship for Research on Women and Social Change that was created in memory of Casgrain.

'''Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There is only one post and it is about a dead link.

'''How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? The article is a part of three WikiProjects, the Biography project, Cooperatives, and Women's History. There is no rating.

Mwpiper (talk) 17:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC) Maggie