User talk:Mx. Granger/Archives/2019

CGP Grey
Dear Mx. Granger,

CGP Grey releases podcasts far more frequently than he releases YouTube videos.

Thanks, stevenjo28 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenjo28 (talk • contribs) 18:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Not relevant. He's notable for being a Youtuber. See the talk page archives. —Granger (talk · contribs) 03:05, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ottelia acuminata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dali ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ottelia_acuminata check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ottelia_acuminata?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Juul
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Juul. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 May 2019 (UTC)


 * There are several sources for "jewel". See another source: "JUUL (pronounced jewel) looks like a USB drive, and is promoted as an alternative to combustible cigarettes and existing e-cigarettes or vaping devices.1" See another source: "There are a few things stopping me from vaping full-time, things that Juul (pronounced "jewel") has to fix to win my affection." Please respond to this comment on the talk page. Thanks. QuackGuru ( talk ) 15:30, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited China–United States trade war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/China%E2%80%93United_States_trade_war check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/China%E2%80%93United_States_trade_war?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:14, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Cassie de Pecol
Cassie de Pecol is not the first woman to travel to every country on Earth. She rightfully earned those Guinness World Record titles but any additional claims are false. A German woman had a book published by a major German book publisher detailing her extensive travel to every country on earth before Cassie De Pecol even began her trip. This was covered by German press (see sources 4,5,6,7,8 below). Cassie's book was not published by any major or established publisher and cannot be taken as fact. Numerous American woman presented information and proof showing they had visited every country on earth. See sources 1, 2, 3. Additionally, De Pecol must have falsely told the New York Times she was the first woman to travel to every nation, after they published an article with that claim, they issued a correction. See the final source (8). 1- View from the Wing - Fake News: Cassie de Pecol Not Actually First Woman to Travel to Every Country in the World? 2 - Huffington Post - https://www.huffpost.com/entry/is-the-media-spreading-fake-news_b_59209876e4b0e8f558bb2716 3 - Rapid Travel Chai - The Women Who Have Traveled to Every Country in the World (Media Fact-Checking Guide) February 15, 2017 4 - RTL - https://www.rtl-hessen.de/beitrag/frankfurter-autorin-nina-sedano-ist-die-laendersammlerin 5 - Wikipedia - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nina_Sedano 6 - Bild - https://www.bild.de/regional/frankfurt/frankfurt-aktuell/frankfurt-laendersammlerin-nina-sedano-hat-neue-abenteuer-erlebt-61535192.bild.html 7 - Lovely Books - https://www.lovelybooks.de/autor/Nina-Sedano/ 8 - Schoener Denken - https://schoener-denken.de/blog/die-laendersammlerin/ 9 - New York Times - https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/25/travel/solo-female-travel.html

Embby (talk) 00:12, 12 October 2019 (UTC)


 * We can absolutely cover the controversy if it is discussed by reliable sources, but accusing a living person of making a false claim needs a better source than the one you added to the article. Please see WP:BLP and WP:RS. —Granger (talk · contribs) 12:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for this information. I see you noted that BuzzFeed was a source and should be discredited because of that. There are no sources from BuzzFeed. Look at The New York Times correction. Look at previous versions of the The New York Times story to see the correction that needed to be made based off of what she seems to be claiming. Will revise, but please make sure to actually look at the sources please.

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)