User talk:Mxztswnr

blocked with an expiry time of indefinite
Wikipedia editors seem to make sure those, who want to add a limited one line section get reverted multiple times as if they never produced an edit and then they ***ban you***.

three-revert rule by design
It seems wikipedia by default enourages the editors to revert the edit up to three times just to invoke either of command { { subst:uw-3RR } }  or  { {subst:an3-notice } }

Egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protection_policy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Office_actions#Currently_under_scrutiny

[...] I will NOT tell a senator, artist, news-figure, etc. to GOFIXIT. It is our responsibility, not theirs, to get the information correct. These are not contributors--they are the subjects of whom our contributors write.

policy
it is a violation of the privacy policy to reveal their IP, whereabouts, or other information sufficient to identify them

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/CheckUser_Policy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy

http://utrs.wmflabs.org/privacy.php

Mxztswnr (talk) 12:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)