User talk:My2sense2wikip

Welcome to User talk:My2sense2wikip
The subject in question is me. My2sense2wikip (talk) 07:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC) I think I reserve the right to discuss, criticize, ridicule, and erase personal insults here. My2sense2wikip (talk) 07:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

but I guess not necessarily. My2sense2wikip (talk) 07:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello,, welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are a few pages that you might find interesting and helpful:
 * Editing: The concise cheatsheet, or the short introduction guide
 * Overview: The Five pillars, condensed philosophy and policies
 * Featured articles, the standard that all articles are trying to achieve (theoretically, eventually)
 * Our Manual of Style
 * Help:Contents, the main help menu

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages (the discussion tab) using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date.

Don't be afraid of making mistakes, as all changes are kept, and problems can be easily reverted with the "history" tab of each page.

If you need help, check out Questions, or ask me on. Again, welcome! -- Quiddity (talk) 03:55, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Repeated Purposeful Adding of PERTINENT Source in Seductive Poison
Someone whose all about destroying links to noteworthy and pertinent information has this to say about me:

I've tried to discuss the matter, but you don't seem to want to engage in constructive discussion.

What a ****ing bigot?!

My2sense2wikip (talk) 21:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Given your comments on the issue (which themselves violated Wikipedia policy) and repeated purposeful reverts adding an unreliable source, I will be forced to take this to ANI (where you'll likely be blocked) if you keep this up.Mosedschurte (talk) 04:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

"Your conduct is the subject of an ANI It is here.Mosedschurte (talk) 04:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)"

Blocked

You have been blocked for 48 hours for edit warring. You exceeded the three revert rule on Seductive Poison. On top of this you logged out to edit war here and repeatedly added material to a page where it was clear you did not have consensus to do so. You may contest this block by placing the text anywhere on your talk page. An administrator (not me) will review the unblock request and accept or decline your unblock. Please be advised that only your conduct is important to your unblock. Possible suggestions for how to phrase your unblock request are available at the guide to appealing blocks. Protonk (talk) 05:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Protonk,

I appreciate your acknowledgement that user Mosedschurte was edit warring too, but you are mistaken to say that I did a revert from IP address (69.22.221.46). That never was my IP address and I don't know how you've come to that conclusion it was ever my IP address. here. All my edits so far should have been from the exact same IP address as the account from this edit. If there are other accounts from this IP address, I am unaware of them and they are not sockpuppets. At least 2 other people share the current IP address which this message is being posted.

I also appreciate your acknowledgement that what I posted was not vandalism.

I was not aware of the three revert rule and see no reason why I would want to revert more than 3 times after a 24 hour period.

If you find it in your administrative duty to agree these childish, stubborn and combative persistent demands by Mosedschurte that those references be removed, all I ask is a better explanation far more scholarly and rational from a seasoned professiona, arbitrator and moderator rather than  parroting  Mosedschurte's  combative, stubborn, outlandish, juvenile, childish, infantile, and mentally retarded boldfaced lies and condemnation that this reference John Judge at ratical.org, is all about espousing the extremist fringe theory that "Jonestown was an experiment, part of a 30-year program called MK-ULTRA, the CIA and military intelligence code name for mind control", in violation of WP:Reliable sources. The Black hole of Guyana names pertinent names and roles to the subject of the article as far as I can see and even if it is espousing some strong accusation, I see no reason why that fact discredits the valid information pertinent to the article. The alleged extremist fringe theory is entirely up to the party responsible for clicking on this reference to decide. The purpose of this reference is to give interested readers who Deborah Layton's a clue who George Phillip Blakey was and mention he was her husband/consort/derjur was while in Jonestown. People like Mosedschurte clearly have an agenda to prevent people on wikipedia from knowing about this information. My2sense2wikip (talk) 07:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Even if that article is considered "extremist fringe theory" by wikipedia guidelines. It's even worse that Mosedschurte would continuously censor this reference:

Deborah Layton is the daughter of the late Laurence Laird Layton"Laurence Laird Layton's obitiuary"

This is an undisputed well recognized mainstream link to her father's background. There is no sane explanation why Laurence Laird Layton's obituary link can't be included either and I don't appreciate the continued liberty that you as a wikipedia moderator and all your responsibility would continue to allow such a bigoted and obtuse individual like Mosedschurte to run rampant censoring the free thinking flow of information of notable people VERY PERTINENT to the article. My2sense2wikip (talk) 07:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC) My2sense2wikip (talk) 05:16, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Your Conduct Regarding Seductive Poison is Again the Subject of An ANI Discussion
It is here.

Talk Page Comments Warning
Do not alter the talk page comments of other editors, as you have done here. If you wish to add to the discussion, add your comments without deleting those of other editors. Dayewalker (talk) 22:58, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you again for calling a user a "fucking bigot", edit warring against consensus again, and then talk page comment altering. If you wish to contest this block, please copy/paste this template:. Regards, Scarian  Call me Pat!  23:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Scarian, I wrote "What a ****ing bigot?!" and nothing else. This is a talk page for a certain user, not an article commentary. I don't see what's wrong with having a healthy exchange of opininions. You're punishing me for your dirty imagination. Don't you people ever have any control over how creepy your anal-retentive control fixes ever get?

My2sense2wikip (talk) 06:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)