User talk:My322/sandbox

Sixtine's peer review
•	The lead section is well drafted, it presents a clear overview of what PB is and how its different instantiations may vary. It also locates well PB among the other democratic innovations. However, I wonder whether this sentence is quite clear (“Moreover, PB, as a normative device, may be either deliberative or purely consultative”), as to me, the opposite of consultative is to be binding, not deliberative. A consultative PB is often deliberative. •	The revision of the lead paragraph for the section implementation is really good. The references to other Wikipedia articles will allow the reader to quickly access other experiences without difficult research. •	Your structure for the “Example Countries of PB" seems clearer to me. •	I would not delete the outcome of the Brazilian experience. Since it is the first experience of PB, it makes sense to expand more on this one. •	Republic of Korea: it would be really interesting to have more information on the process of the PB in that country •	India: This sentence seems not really neutral to me and would deserve more explanation: Bangalore was the first to implement PB in India in 2001 with the help of a local NGO; nevertheless, the system quickly lost efficacy over time. •	The criticism section revision seems clarifying to me. •	These two links (notes 5 and 6) are not working: "Participatory Budgeting – Working together, making a difference". Toronto Community Housing. ; PB Hamilton, Ontario, CA.