User talk:MyNameIsNotBob/Archive 6

Hey
I know I'm not logged in and I didn't use an edit summary, but what I did on Radius_of_gyration wasn't meant as vandalism. I thought that my edit was an improvement because the introduction to the article was ridiculously off putting and confusing to people who didn't know what the topic was... which I would think would be most of the people who'd end up at the article. I think it'd still need some work, but I think that its still an all around better article without that wordy and confusion intro paragraph. 192.136.22.4 04:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I reverted it for the reasons that you listed above. Please at least use edit summaries if you aren't logged in. Feel free to redo your edits. MyNam e IsNotBob  04:05, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Goole Article
Hi, thanks for changing the Goole article back from the vandalised version.

Just a quick query about this, as it seems to be happening repeatedly. Would it be worth putting one of the vandalism boxes on the bottom of the page? Just starting to annoy me a bit, thats all.

Thanks, Tom. TomiG 17:43, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I'll add it to my watchlist and we'll see what happens. MyNam e IsNotBob  20:41, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that. much appreciated. You may want to see what he's put on my talk page, here.  How cheeky is that?!?  TomiG 21:46, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Cel es tianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Irish-Scots
Dear Sir:

If you bother to review my edits to the Irish-Scots page you will see that they are NOT nonsense, and that there is a concerted effort by various other editors (Demiurge, who is a Catholic apologist and wannabe censor, Ali-oops, Camillus, Jtdirl, and others) to censor my edits, not attempt to refute them, which they cannot, because they are the truth. The same is true of the Tim Pat Coogan, Celtic F.C. and other pages which are a source of constant contention due to the attempts by the abovementioned Irish Wikipedians to censor not correct or tidy up -- them!!

I stand by everything I edit on Wikipedia.

72.11.217.43 00:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * This is yet another sock-puppet of User:Rms125a@hotmail.com, see recent Requests for comment/Rms125a@hotmail.com. An RfA was also followed, but an admin decided that there was no need for arbitration, and banned Rms by acclimation, given his history of disgusting personal attacks and virulent POV pushing. This latest sock even went to the stage of attacking me personally in the article namespace of Irish-Scots. It doesn't seem to phase him in the slightest that not a single Scottish or Rangers-supporting wikipedian has supported this American's edits of this article or Celtic F.C. article, on the contrary, they have reverted his blatant sectarian POV edits - in fact a respected Rangers-supporting Wikipedian was subjected to a disgusting attack for reverting his vandalism. As for "constant contention" - this is disingenuous at best, given that he has found not a single other editor to agree with his bile. Camillus (talk) 00:40, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Please see Requests_for_comment/Rms125a%40hotmail.com as well as his recent arbitration case. Please also see User_talk:Demiurge, User_talk:Ali-oops/Robert_Sieger and - Ali-oops&#9997;  06:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Answered on my talk page - Ali-oops&#9997; 06:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense?
What are you talking about? FourEcks refers to the Last Continent. A link to the world of discworld is too nonspecific.


 * Use edit summaries as a signed in user and I will be less inclined to treat your edit as vandalism. MyNam e IsNotBob  00:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * p.s. Especially when Last Continent does not exist. MyNam e IsNotBob  00:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Oops, fixed it. Sorry about that.128.113.137.111 00:16, 24 April 2006 (UTC)