User talk:My lord cambridge

Recent edit to The Stones I Throw
Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the The Stones I Throw article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! JeremiahY (talk) 23:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ijahman Levi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--Michig (talk) 17:28, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ijahman Levi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Please provide a source for the information you wish to add. Discuss it on the talk page rather than continually making the same edit. --Michig (talk) 19:29, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sun Records, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 23:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alan Freed has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm Kaobear. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Les Green has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kaobear (talk) 21:13, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Geoff Hurst
Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Geoff Hurst article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Kaobear (talk) 21:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George Best. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Kaobear (talk) 21:28, 13 June 2016 (UTC)