User talk:Myaperez

Your edits to Keshia Chanté
Hi. I removed some hidden text that you added to the article because the tone was inappropriate for the encyclopedia. I understand that you feel strongly about improving the article, but the way to do that is with helpful edits and citing your sources, not through namecalling. Please let me know if you have any questions. janejellyroll 19:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I reverted your changes to the article because, among other things, the date of birth is clearly not verified. While there is disagreement about the birthdate, it isn't appropriate to have it in the article. Please use the talk page to discuss this issue and be prepared to cite sources in support of your additions. janejellyroll 22:37, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop your edits to this article unless you are willing to respect concensus and work with other editors instead of against them. You are restoring inaccurate information and POV language to this article. This is not acceptable. Please use the talk page to dicuss potential changes to the article. janejellyroll 03:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Keshia Chanté:
Your recent edit to Keshia Chanté (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 04:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during January 27 2007 (UTC) to Keshia Chanté
Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kesac 04:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. janejellyroll 04:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. --Wirbelwind ヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 04:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger 04:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Keshia Chanté
Your most recent revision of this article removed all the sources that another editor worked hard to include. If you're not going to help make the article better, I'd request that you just stay away from the article. Thank you. janejellyroll 05:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC)