User talk:Myat T. Aung

December 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=636561588 your edit] to Toxicology may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 ""s and 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. {| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; margin-top: 0.2em;" |- ! style="background-color: #FAA;" | List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page (Click show ⇨ ) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:00, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; " |
 * estimate the the physicochemical, biological/toxicological and environmental fate properties. cite book|last=Leeuwen |first=van C.J.|last=Vermeire|first=T.G. |year=2007 |url=http://www.springer.
 * of chemistry, biology and toxicology. There are three fundamental parts in (Q)SARs models: i  the characteristics of the chemical on which the model is based, ii  properties and effect which can help predict endpoints (responses) and iii  the algorithm that converts the descriptors (or substructures) into the endpoint (response) of
 * that converts the descriptors (or substructures) into the endpoint (response) of interest. Adverse effects of chemicals depend on two main factors: i routes of exposure (oral, inhalation, and dermal)and ii  duration and concentration of exposed chemicals which leads to testing of acute toxicity testing,
 * of chemistry, biology and toxicology. There are three fundamental parts in (Q)SARs models: i  the characteristics of the chemical on which the model is based, ii  properties and effect which can help predict endpoints (responses) and iii  the algorithm that converts the descriptors (or substructures) into the endpoint (response) of
 * of chemistry, biology and toxicology. There are three fundamental parts in (Q)SARs models: i  the characteristics of the chemical on which the model is based, ii  properties and effect which can help predict endpoints (responses) and iii  the algorithm that converts the descriptors (or substructures) into the endpoint (response) of

Great Job
Hello Myat, your article was perfect, that you have mentioned what is toxicology and its method in a range of field, but I would like to suggest that you could add the internal link on “Structure-Activity Relationships” (SARs) and “Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (Q)SARs so that the readers could get more detail of these two. Also when I try to search “Quantitative Structural-Activity Relationships (Q)SARs on google it said that the word "Structural" should be "Structure" but still this is only my suggestion and opinion, Thank you. You have done a great job! --D5481026 (talk) 01:55, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the peer review
Thank you for your review Myat. I will take care of the extra "h" in the reference and try to adjust the sequence of my sentences. --PakpongICCH444 (talk) 04:19, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Toxicology
Please stop posting content directly into the toxicology article. Much of what you posted was incorrect and was wrongly formatted. I appreciate that this is a school project but please post content first on the Talk page for other editors to review. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 12:55, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
 * are you perhaps a student, working on WP for a school project? Jytdog (talk) 21:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Toxicology. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 02:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.