User talk:Myfrolive

Welcome!

Hello, Myfrolive, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hue-man, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sparthorse (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Hue-man


A tag has been placed on Hue-man requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Wording in direct quotes
Do not change wording in direct quotes as you did here and  at Ancient Egyptian race controversy. I checked the ref here, and the original wording was accurate. I'm AGFing on this, but before you go changing stuff in the future, actually check the references.  He  iro 17:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Have all been reverted, either by me or other editors. You are still pushing your 'hue-man', but what is worse is that you are changing journal article titles, quotes, etc because, it appears, you don't like the word that was used. Thus you changed the journal article "The Asiatic black man": An African American Orientalism?" to ""The Asiatic black people": An African American Orientalism?",", presumably to make some sort of point. I'm sorry, but I have to say if you are going to continue with such edits you are almost certainly going to be blocked. You also should start using edit summaries. Dougweller (talk) 21:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. When you recently edited Black, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nubian and Power (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Your edit at White people
Please note that Wikipedia articles are based on published reliable sources. If you persist in making edits like you did to the article here you are liable to be blocked from editing. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:32, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)