User talk:Mylaisubu

Welcome!
Hello, Mylaisubu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Jim1138 (talk) 09:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Recent edits to C. K. Prahalad
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Acabashi (talk) 04:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Your edit was probably undone as it was unsourced, looks like original research, and had a narrative tone. Please cite your sources with edits. Wikipedia needs to be verifiable, significant edits need cite reliable sources. Please peruse the welcome section above on editing. Uncited text is likely to be removed. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

i have persoanlly worked with both M K raju and C K prahald. what more proof do you want Unless you incorpoarte my   addtional inputs the article would not be  truly representing C K prahalad's  life

````
 * Unfortunately yours, mine, or anybody's personal reflections on a subject is not trustworthy, however much we know the 'truth of the matter'. You must understand that anyone can claim to be closely associated with a subject and have special insight, but we are all relatively anonymous here, so that an addition based on a special relationship cannot be taken at face value. What many editors fail to understand is that Wikipedia is not primarily about what is 'right' or 'truthful', but what can be verified through reliable sources. Many thanks for considering contributing to Wikipedia - I hope you will continue. Acabashi (talk) 15:38, 22 December 2013 (UTC)