User talk:Mylaptops

Welcome!
Hello, Mylaptops, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Kiritas
Hi, I see that you have been entering some interesting information about Kirata on various Indian community articles. Can you provide more information about the book that you cite, please? Who published it? When? What is the ISBN number? What authority does the writer have? That sort of thing. You can reply below - I've added this talk page to my watchlist. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 11:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Urginea Nagarjunae, Mylaptops!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Reviewed as part of page curation. Previously tagged as technical. Article complete with references and categories. Content may be appropriate for Wikispecies. Needs precise taxobox.Kieranian2001 (talk) 11:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Why I could not add content?
Dear sir! I could not add any content in Kshatriya article. Being a Kshatriya, I know that the article has multiple issues due to lack of clarity. But to free it from clarity, some one has to edit it. Some one is asking for referrences. How can there be a referrence until some one post some information?. Even, the referrences are nothing but original researches written in any book. I think some one is owning this article personally and not allowing any one to edit.

Speedy deletion nomination of Red aloe vera


A tag has been placed on Red aloe vera, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the page be "userfied" or emailed to you. —Noiratsi (talk) 10:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using this account to evade a block on another account. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:39, 15 February 2013 (UTC)