User talk:Myoneme19

Speedy deletion of Apia (band)
A tag has been placed on Apia (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fritzpoll (talk) 00:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Anyone willing to teach me the difference between a noteworthy and non-noteworthy band is welcome to. Perhaps Apia will be a worthy page in coming years but isn't now, because they aren't recognized as a household name? I'm a little confused as to what qualifies some bands over another, as I have read about several semi-obscure bands on this site.Myoneme19 (talk) 00:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)