User talk:Myosho

Hello - you seem to be new to wikipedia, and unfamiliar with how things work here, basic editing guidelines, etiquette, and rules. Here's a link to help get you started. In particular, check out the rules about edit warring. I would point out to you that the material you keep insisting on including on the Dae Gak page violates guidelines for BLP and NPOV. I am not arguing with you whether or not Dae Gak has or has not abused anyone or had disciplinary action - it appears that there are some very questionable things surrounding him. What you need to understand is that we don't have a good enough source for allegations this serious. Such a source would need to be independent, third-party ("tertiary"), and contextualized. In other words, a news source: newspaper or such. The standard for such contentious material is higher than for simple facts like when or where someone was born or went to school. I and others have stated this repeatedly and yet you seem to not be understanding. It's not personal, at least not for me. I have worked on a number of pages concerning controversial religious figures, and have made some of the same mistakes you are now making.

You clearly have strong feelings about this issue, which are causing you to say unacceptable things in talk, and break numbers of rules here. If you do not start to play by them, you risk being blocked from editing here. Let me reiterate that this is not a "chat room." We do not discuss the topic for its own sake, or use this site to air grievances. Do not make unsourced allegations anywhere on Wikipedia, including in response to this comment. Keep it to editing issues only, using sourced material. Best wishes.Tao2911 (talk) 17:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.