User talk:MyronGuyton

Welcome!

Hello, MyronGuyton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Original research
Ciao! When you write such interesting stuff in a Wikipedia article, containing a lot of debatable opinions (i.e., everything you introduced with "is considered..."), you must provide sources. Otherwise, it'll be considered WP:Original Research and deleted soon. Ciao and good work! --&#39;&#39;&#39;Attilios&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 06:40, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Matthias Corvinus ‎. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''You were explained several times, on the talk page of the article and on your talk page what is wrong with your edit. If you wish, you may file a report. Greetings.'' Adrian (talk) 06:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Matthias Corvinus. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. ''Calling a justified revert(that was explained to you by 3 editors) - vandalism can be considered as a personal attack. Please refrain from inflammatory statements.'' Adrian (talk) 06:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)