User talk:MysteriousTE

Welcome!
Hello, MysteriousTE, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  Comr Melody Idoghor  (talk)  22:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sayed Noorullah Jalili


A tag has been placed on Draft:Sayed Noorullah Jalili, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. GPL93 (talk) 03:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Sayed Noorullah Jalili


The page Draft:Sayed Noorullah Jalili has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:
 * It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

How did you come to edit about this person? It wasn't by chance. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

As you can see in my edits, I have edited pages for underground politicians in UK, India, Pakistan and other. I also did the same on everyone wiki and gyanepedia. This article showed up on gyaanepedia and it has cited sources so I copied to here. You can check my edit history, I have written everything about how I found the article. I just fixed the grammar errors and label it as advertising because it need some changes.
 * I did check your edit history, and that's not what you said in edit summaries. I furthermore don't think that you were just the unluckiest person on Earth to choose a subject for which a blocked user has repeatedly attempted to create an article for. However, you don't need to convince me, but whomever reviews this. 331dot (talk) 09:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

You are entitled to your opinion and I respect your opinion. In the edit summaries, I wrote the same thing I just told you, I found the article on everyonewiki and you can do so yourself. It is both on gyanepedia and everyonewiki. I did more research and the subject has articles on Bloomberg, CBSnews, lots of Afghani networks and even BBC. I don't know about the blocked account but I don't see why the subject is bad to write about. Please let me know.
 * As I said, I don't believe you picked this person at random to edit about, be it in general or among undergroud politicians. Even if you aren't a sock puppet, this would be meat puppetry. If whomever reviews this believes you, they will unblock you and may do so without consulting me further. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Everyonewiki is literally a mirror site of wikipedia. Any content I copy from there was already on wikipedia int he first place. Gyanepedia is literally a hub of one published wikipedia articles. My job for myself was to fix them and publish them here. Your right, I no longer need to consult with you.

331dot, you talked about writing by chance. I apologize for trying to mislead you. I know now that being honest in this scenario is the best instance. This was all by chance. I did not know the other user was going to write about the subject so I went ahead. My skills on wikipedia are pretty average to good and I believe I can be a good contribution to the community if my page lives and I am able to make edits and corrections to other pages as well. I would just like this whole mind-boggling block to be removed so I can go forth with a clean reputation on wikipedia and ensure that at least this one article is published correctly. Once again, I apologize for misleading and giving you false info. The whole story is true except that I do have a conflict of interest which I said I didn't.
 * (edit conflict) I will only say, please read other stuff exists. Other inappropriate articles existing does not mean that more inappropriate articles can be added.  Otherwise, nothing could ever be removed from Wikipedia.  As this is (largely) a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to go undetected, even for years.  We can only address what we know about. If, once unblocked, you would like to help us detect and address articles about non-notable candidates for public office, we could use the help. The rest of this will be dealt with by someone else, should you make another request. 331dot (talk) 10:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Great, I completely understand. In the case that my unblock request is approved by the other admin then I will definitely assist the community by reporting those pages. Even in this new account, I went to my profile and was recommended articles to fix up. I saw at least 20 different ones with unambiguous advertising and clear promotion but they were unblocked and not deleted. The article I am trying to publish is not innaprorpiate nor does it have excessive advertising. Small hints of bias should be dealt with through improvements and suggestions by wikipedia admins. Without a warning or hint, how would the person know what's wrong. Overall, I understand the matter and will follow up with due diligence.