User talk:Mystupidstory

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 09:09, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Signature
Hi, you can just type four tildes " ~ " like so for an automated signature. You can also customize it, see WP:SIGNATURE. Best regards, SerChevalerie (talk) 19:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing your facts on biased article 2020 Delhi riots
This article is written with a biased attitude and has gathered global condemnation on multiple platforms. However the clan of Doug Weller, SerChevalerie, Fouler & Fouler, Slatersteven, Kautilya3, 331dot and El_C are part of a clan who moves in a flock and with utmost no shame counters any independent contributor across world suppressing truth. They bypass reliable source and create a narration of sources which suits their propaganda. Many have asked them to quote from leading reputed newspaper and online news-portal e.g. BBC, TimeNow, TOI, NDTV but they prefer to find those propagandists article sitting in one of those houses which have vested interests. It is of utmost shame that they have soft corner for Islamic terrorism and communism. Am I doing character assassination. Answer is NO. Just dig out there contributions. I am using a AI based bot that summarizes all their edits across Wikipedia and will try to publish it soon. As it is non-structured data so need to put some effort to expose them but I don't have so much time currently. They also had another user with Hinduphobia sentiments called DBigXRay and just google it out to find more details and he was denounced. DBigXRay was tracked down and it will be good to track down the rest of propagandists.

One of them has even mentioned your post as garbage but if you say the same then you will be marked as disrespecting others.

There is no democracy as they will ban a user and will ask to appeal. In general when we debate on platforms or in real we never shut the voice as far as their statements are not opinion and shared from reliable sources. This is worst form of autocracy and we call it curtailing Freedom of Speech. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.56.98.160 (talk) 11:14, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * And what suggestions do you have? Which BBC source have we denied? SerChevalerie (talk) 14:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I feel the same. There seems to be coordinated attempt to maintain a propaganda in this article. Sachin.cba (talk) 08:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for informing this. Tbh I don't know about these people and their agenda. It just feels extremely irritating that they can misrepresent facts this easily. Despite being here for a decade, I was not logged in most of the time and most of my edits (grammar fixes and link fixing) were done unsigned. However, after I told a friend of mine that I had donated to Wiki, he said he won't do it stating that many of the wikipedia articles are controlled by fringe groups who pushes in their ideology through small edits all the time and prevent neutral coverage. When I tried to convince him elsewise, he mentioned the lede on the Delhi article. My edits in that article started out as a way to show him that all that somebody had to do was just make an edit request in the Talk section. Looking back, I wonder why I kept on thinking that I must be doing something fundamentally wrong and to be honest, I just agree with my friend now. Once again, thank you for telling me this. Mystupidstory (talk) 12:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * That entire discussion was archived by them. Basically I guess they deleted the accounts like SerChevalerie and started with new ones. Mystupidstory (talk) 12:57, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

This is the last clean state of that discussion. Mystupidstory (talk) 12:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)