User talk:Mystylplx/Archive-2011

Rollback
Hi. I've added the rollback flag per your request. Please remember only to use it where an informative edit summary is not needed and the edit you are undoing is clearly vandalism. Thank you for you efforts! Pedro : Chat  21:21, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:38, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Why?
Why did you remove this quote from the Ralph Nader article?
 * The Atlantic Monthly, calling Nader one of the hundred most influential Americans in history, said, "He made the cars we drive safer; thirty years later, he made George W. Bush the president."

I notice that this quote is retained in the article (and in the lede no less):
 * In 1990, Life magazine named Nader one of the 100 most influential Americans of the 20th century.

Shouldn't the first quote be in the article too? There is just too much white-washing going on there. 207.158.35.254 (talk) 16:15, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I didn't remove the quote you mentioned. In fact I put it back several times but it kept getting removed so I gave up. Feel free to put it back if you want. Mystylplx (talk) 16:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It was User:Burpelson_AFB who removed the quote. Mystylplx (talk) 16:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

FYI
You were reported at WP:AIV, but the report was assessed as "content dispute" and removed. Let's proceed calmly, but it is clear that something will have to happen to remove the disruption from Natural born citizen clause of the U.S. Constitution. Johnuniq (talk) 09:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your most recent edit (see [ here]) appears to be part of the same recent pattern which I believe you've already acknowledged as a mistake on your part. Please see the article's talk page and continue any needed discussion of the content dispute there. Rich wales (talk · contribs) 17:07, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Edit-Warring
User has a history of edit-warring. User is blocked User:Griot. 99.25.219.55 (talk) 22:10, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Do you have any evidence? Doesn't look very likely to me. Monty  845  04:01, 9 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The same IP-anon posted an identical notice on my talk page. He/she appears to be accusing Mystylplx of being, who was blocked as a sockmaster over three years ago.  The IP-anon should know that this user talk page is not the appropriate place to lodge such an accusation.  In the absence of any evidence supporting the claim, I see no reason to pay any attention to it.   Rich wales (talk · contribs) 07:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Especially since the anon IP has all the necessary evidence and can report it to the Wikimedia Support Team. 99.25.219.55 (talk) 20:34, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know who "griot" is and I'm, not even going to give this nonsense the respect it doesn't deserve. Mystylplx (talk) 22:45, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, Griot. 99.25.218.38 (talk) 22:38, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Ralph Nader
Hello, Mystylplx. I have factored out a discussion about the movement & changes on Talk:Ralph Nader. The IP editor seems agreeable to discussing the matter in good faith, I ask that you likewise discuss the matter. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 14:45, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Please see the talk:Ralph Nader page, and please do not revert the current revision of the Ralph Nader page. Thanks, Markvs88 (talk) 17:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC)