User talk:Mythsearcher/Archive1

Kikuko Inoue
Thank you for responding (and for being able to read Japanese!). I've refined my edit based on your comments. Daarklord (talk) 22:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Haruhi Suzumiya
This man has wrongly altered the changes made (that were CORRECT, might I add) to Haruhi Suzumiya's page here on wikipedia. I am not doubting that he has done good, but he needs to learn not to fix what isn't broken, if you get the analogy. (This unsigned comment was left by an anonymous user)
 * Nice try, but everything you've done so far has been pure vandalism, and Mythsearcher doesn't need to be slandered by someone who's lying, especially on their own userpage by someone who doesn't identify themselves. Katsuhagi 13:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Male
Thanks for reveritng The Almighty's gender back to male. For some apparent reason, people came under the concensus that his gender was unknown (WTF..?!)... Anyhow, glad you're contributing so soon, and welcome to wikipedia! -MegamanZero|Talk 16:39, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Non-sexual
Emmm... I have been contributing for quite awhile now. I have no idea why a father of 3 daughters can have a gender of unknown? Somehow, some of the people seems to be just making random edits to things they do not fully know. MythSearcher 16:50, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, well regarding your edits, you haven't made many, so I assumed you were knew here, and that's why I gave you the welcome. :) -MegamanZero|Talk 18:17, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Your name sounds familiar to me
Nope, I've never studied at UMR. I know there are a couple of people out there with the same name; maybe you're thinking of one of them. Brendan 21:56, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Your Gundam templates
I've seen your Gundam userboxes, particularly User UCGundamEF and User ZickZeon. But I have to remind to modify your templates, because the images you used, Image:EarthFederationFlag.PNG and Image:Zeon.jpg are labelled as copyrighted images. According the Wikipedia policy on userboxes, you cannot use copyrighted images in them, especially logos and those labelled Fair use in.... You can only use free images or just use text. - 上村七美 | talk 15:57, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Narnia
Hello, I noticed that you edited an article related to, or expressed interest in The Chronicles of Narnia. I thought you may be interested in knowing that there is a WikiProject working to improve articles about Narnia, your help would be greatly appreciated. Please consider joining the WikiProject Narnia. Thank you! Bornagain4 17:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Negima PSG-1.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima PSG-1.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 14:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Cosmic Era Newtypes
Though they are not referred to officially as newtypes, they fall under the definition of a newtype which classifies anyone with a high spatial awareness as a newtytpe in the spirit of the word. In short high spatial awareness=newtype. Not all newtypes are able to send message to their pods without the aid of a computer.


 * Reply posted on User talk:58.71.28.130. Do not use speculation and personal research to contaminate wiki articles, a raven is a bird does not mean that all birds are ravens, your logic does not even work properly. MythSearcher 05:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Actually, he/she is right. All newtypes have spatial awareness. That's what makes them a newtype. So saying that all people with spatial awareness must be a newtype seems logical cause that's what makes them a newtype. I don't think he wastrying to use that analogy that you said.


 * Nonsense. All NTs have high spacial awareness does not equat to all people having high spacial awareness are NTs. NTs are NT not because they have high spacial awareness, NTs are NTs because there are called one.  NTs having the ability to control psycommu systems, having the ability to make their own MS invincible(Z and ZZ), having the ability to telephathically talk to people who are not NT(FG, last scene, Amuro talked to everyone on White base to instrict them to escape.)  Also, Speculation is speculation, no proof is given, thus rv. MythSearcher 10:12, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Newtypes are defined by their abilities. Therefore a person with spatial awareness is considered a newtype. If we use your logic, then everyone can be called a newtype.

Here is an evidence that there are newtypes in the CE: http://aeug.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_aeug_archive.html


 * This is NOT a reliable source. This is just a blog entry translating another blog entry, while the last sentence was skipped I have no idea if it is intentional or not but obviously it is not reliable.
 * here search for NT look at the last sentence: 当初の企画の名残.
 * Which essencially renders the whole paragraph useless, because it means The above was the original idea (the above meaning Mwu and Raww being last NTs but people try to find a different solutions other than NTs)
 * This original blog entry basically is proof of there are no NTs in the CE timeline because the story was changed.
 * Although it still does not change the fact that all blog entries are not reliable sources and cannot be used as an evidence when concerning wiki articles. MythSearcher 14:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

According to the Gundam Seed Destiny Model Book #2 states the second-gen DRAGOON systems do in fact use the pilot's brain waves.

Someone added claims that Shinn and Rey were newtypes to the Lacus Clyne page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lacus_Clyne It was the only post by that IP. I reverted it, but I don't know if people have added things like this to other Gundam Seed pages. Edward321 01:57, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Request for help
I and two other posters have a diffence of opinion on the Lunamaria Hawke page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunamaria_Hawke (and the associated discussion). Obviously, each of the three of us believe our view is right and the other two are wrong. Clearly, this needs someone else to resolve this and I'm hoping you can do so, or at least point me to someone who can. Thank you. Edward321 02:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Tried to edit the line 'Love' to 'Love Interests' to bring the page into conformity with other Gundam pages. Instead, the line appears to no longer be listed, which I do not understand.  (Note I did not change the listed Interest, that would be pointless until this is resolved.) Edward321 06:31, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Final Fantasy character classes - thank you!
Thank you so much for being proactive and removing all the speculation from this article. I appreciate it. :D -RaCha&#39;ar 17:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Darkishblade
FYI, this user you temporarily blocked is seemingly back and posting as an IP address. One of the other editors tried to negotiate on the board he's spamming and he was notably unapologetic: "this site deserves to be listed on Wikipedia with no exceptions" external link removed here because it was on the spam blacklist meaning this page could no longer be saved —Wknight94 (talk) 01:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC). Oddly he then flew off on a tirade about the Wikipedia is such an unsuitable place for him to advertise his forum, yet he keeps doing it. Well, at any rate, he's demonstrated a point-blank unwillingness to follow the rules so further action may be in order. Sockatume 02:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Gundam articles
You need to be citing your sources for information and seek consensus on information instead of RVing anything that disagrees with your particular viewpoint. Yzak Jule 17:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

No, saying "it's official" is NOT citing your sources. Yzak Jule 19:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Then you need to say it's from MS Encyclopedia (which, going back 500 edits, you haven't), and also prove it. Yzak Jule 04:48, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

discussion in Afd
I must base my comments on other forms of fiction, but i think you understand what are rational criteria.DGG 05:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

May I ask for help on MSZ-006 Zeta Gundam?
I remember you mention you're going to work on many UC articles and wonder if this article is in your schedule. I just merged ZII into the article and plan to merge Re-GZ as well. However, it seem main part of article is big mess, lot of info yet somehow not exist in harmony. I think it's beyond my scope of ability, especially since I have so little knownledge on the addition Zetas from Gundam Evolve. I though about put clean-up tag, but realize that the problem need a fellow fan to resolve. So may I ask you to help clean-up the article? L-Zwei 17:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

AFD
If you are going to merge articles in an AFD, it'd be best if you removed the AFD tag while you do so after the AFD discussion is finished.— Řÿūłóñģ ( 竜龍 ) 09:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Some article redirected has been reverted. Please notice that I am working to merge in Minor Warships and Spacecrafts of Cosmic Era (Gundam). Just added Aegis, anyway. Draconins 10:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Currently I am working as fast as possible. I have already warned about "explosion" already, right? ^^ Draconins 10:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The problem is... that I am changing format too.... I currently using history.... I am changing from using table to list. Draconins 10:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hehehe.... If we keep using table, it would be messy. So please wait a little while... ^_^ Draconins 10:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

CAT1-X Hyperion Gundam series AfD DRV
FYI—you might be interested in the deletion review of my closing of the CAT1-X Hyperion Gundam series AfD. —Doug Bell talk 07:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

CS Lewis
Hi Benjamin, thanks for your recent edit to the C.S. Lewis article. The note to editors that you changed was the result of a lot of discussion and reflected the broad consensus of opinion among editors of the page. It is generally not considered good form to edit such notices unless you are sure that the edit reflects consensus also. If you'd like to raise any concerns you have on the article talk page instead, it will be easier to resolve any disagreements. Cheers, Martin 16:06, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

24.118.153.134
I assumed good faith on the edits, until he/she started deleting official sources just to change numbers to his/her own content. MythSearchertalk 00:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Can you give examples of those and explain why there is a problem? Without knowing the subject, I can't say what is right and wrong so I have to assume good faith and say the edits look okay.  Thanks.  —Wknight94 (talk) 01:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I really don't understand what this person is doing. Trolling I guess.  Seems to be reverting himself almost as often as reverting others.  Universal Century Technology no longer has the content he kept adding.  I've left him a test4 for today's continued edit warring.  Given the quality of the writing, I'm guessing it's a child.  I'll try to assume good faith but something odd is obviously going on.  Give me diffs for any other obvious bad edits you can find - that will make it easier to support a block.  Thanks.  —Wknight94 (talk) 03:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Bizarre. I just don't understand this IP.  Making half a dozen edits and then reverting himself.  I don't know what to make of it.  Unforunately I'm not knowledgeable with the subjects he's editing so I can't tell if edits like this are even vandalism or just atrocious typing by a child. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I left 24.118.153.134 a "last warning" on their talk page for their disruptive edits to Late Universal Century. I reckon 24.118.153.134 is just a child. 24.118.153.134's English skills aren't the greatest and 24.118.153.134 does not listen to reason.--Just James 03:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm having a lot of trouble with this guy on Ace Combat pages... he has tons of "Last Warnings," but moderator action hasn't been taken since last November... ZakuTalk 20:06, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

...dammit, he's back, and as disruptive as ever. ZakuTalk 22:33, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

RX-78 afd
Amen, brother, amen. Kyaa the Catlord 14:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Don't be a dick, those AfDs were made in good faith and for good reason. Just because you don't agree with someone doesn't mean you have to say the things you've been saying. Right or wrong, it only makes the debate more heated and won't stop any future AfDs (it might even encourage them). Don't take it personally, because now you're giving WP:GUNDAM and other Gundam editors a bad image. -- Ned Scott 20:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Civil
You're right, sorry. I get frustrated when it seems my balls are getting busted over my well-referenced articles when Wikipedia is rife with completely non-WP:V, unreferenced ju...stuff. スキャンダルの家 (House of Scandal) 11:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Mana
It seems you do not understand - World of Mana is not "world of Mana". The series is capital W. I fail to see how they were referring to the series of games under the World of Mana title when they were talking about exploring the "world of Mana". And considering that they called the series Mana, wouldn't the logical assumption be that they were saying to "explore the world of the Mana series"? Seriously, you contradicted yourself and you don't like to admit it. You'll get over it. - A Link to the Past (talk) 09:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Debate in the WikiProject Dragon Quest
Hello, since you're interested in video games articles, I thought I'd inform you of a debate currently taking place in the WikiProject Dragon Quest (with familiar faces). It is about whether we should use the name Slime MoriMori Dragon Quest or Dragon Quest Heroes for the slime spin-off series of the franchise. There are currently not enough people involved to actually reach a clear consensus, so you are invited to read the discussion (or have a look, if it's too long) here and here and give your opinion on the question. Thank you! Kariteh 07:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: FFVII spoiler tag
WP:3RR, for the record, states that one editor may not revert one article more than 3 times in 24 hours. I only reverted twice, so I am not near or in violation of the rule at all. I didn't realize that people were so stuffy about replying on a talk post, then noticing that someone not only directed people to the talk page, but hadn't written anything on it yet. I reverted the second time because of this discrepancy. Usually, I like to write the Talk post in question before I revert and say "see talk page!!!", because otherwise if someone notices that you're saying "see talk post" before it's there, it looks silly. Sorry for being diligent about upholding standards that have been in place on the article, and the wikiproject, for ages. Nique talk 15:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Antarctic Treaty
I disagree. It wasn't just that they were developing the Gundam there; they had an entire base set up in Libot. The existence of this base put neutral civilian lives in danger. Furthermore, the Gray Phantom unit actively engaged the Cyclops team within the colony as a result, further putting lives in danger. This certainly does not fit in with the protocols seen taken in 0079, when the White Base did not return fire until after they had crossed the borders. I'd be interested to know your opinion on the matter, though. Thank you for your time. James Callahan 13:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand what you mean. Thank you. James Callahan 15:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Tifa Lockhart discussion
Hey, I know it's none of my business, but I couldn't help but notice the constant back and forth between you and User:Lilwik. I backed off from that discussion because that particular user has consistently circumvented any counter arguments that were presented to them, without really proving their point at all. Many of the things they said disregarded or ignored previous statements/counter arguments by other users, and tried turn the original user's words on them. Basically I think this person just likes to argue because they like to be right, not to be constructive. They win arguments by being stubborn and pushing against the opposition. My unsolicited advice to you is to simply disengage from the discussion. Without anything to push against, people like that normally lose steam. Most every other user on here could look at the discussion and see that most of the claims made by Lilwik don't fall in line with what Wikipedia is about. Like I said, I know it's none of my business, but I'd hate see someone needlessly stress out over something so trivial. If you'd like some help might I suggest checking out Mediation if you haven't already. Once again, my apologies for butting in. Happy editing. (Guyinblack25 03:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC))

Hitodama
Regarding hitodama, I don't want an edit war. Yes, there are many references in modern culture, but it doesn't mean you have to list them all. Can you really not see how silly long lists like this are? How about reducing the section to a single paragraph with words to the effect that hitodama has many references in video games and anime? --Auximines 10:45, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

MA-08 Big Zam
If you want to redirect MA-08 Big Zam, be my guest, I just speedily closed the AFD. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 08:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirected. I did not do a real merge, just added a short paragraph on the redirect page, in which, should be more suited for wikipedia. MythSearchertalk 08:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Good enough for me. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:39, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:GP00.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GP00.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

One quick question
Are you watching User talk:Scipio3000? The reason I ask is so that i know whether or not i need to notify you of something that needs your intention. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 17:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * A note: Thank you for your input; you have provided me with a great deal of information. I have one content related question for you: It seems that you were the one that discovered the copyright vio -> if so -> how did you discover the violation? Beyond that, I have some comments if you want to hear them; they are not content related, but rather some *tips* to avoid *most* content disputes.  As I am heavily involved with 3 editors in a content dispute, I can sympathize a great deal for your position.  I believe mine are unfortunately "unavoidable" in so much as - unless i leave the content space altogether, a template that is under heavy development could very easily be "misappropriated".  If you would like me to do so, i'll be glad to toss some thoughts your way, but i just wanted to let you know that they are not content related.  LMK at your convenience; perhaps I can help move the discussion toward the goal during your time away from the matter. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat  18:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Scipio3000
Yeah, I tried reasoning with him early on. You see how well that goes. Which is why I've been ignoring him for a while now. Edward321 14:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

AGF reminder re Gundam AfD
Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Eleland 15:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, I don't have any idea of what personal history might be involved here. All I can say is that coming upon the discussion "blind", you appeared to be seriously in the wrong. Deletionism is a valid position and launching a series of AfDs is not inherently disruptive. Nor are editors obligated to gain a deep knowledge of fictional subjects in order to propose their articles for deletion; that would violate WP:OWN. You would do better in future to express yourself more carefully, so that your valid points will not be obscured by issues of AGF or civility. Eleland 15:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Belldandy
[...] And I AM holding quite a few sources at hand to prove anyone thinking of proving it otherwise wrong [...]


 * Hi, you said you had sources establishing notability. I am more than willing to pull back the AfD nomination if these sources are provided. -- Cat chi? 14:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Psyco Gundam
Since I voted to delete the article originally (it was trash), I felt obligated to make a new one, and I've finally gotten around to doing it. Of course it's immediately become the target of that anonymous troll and his WP:POINT war, but whatever, I'll find a way to deal with that.

Moving right along. You've done great work to include cultural significance to the RX-78 Gundam and other articles, including the Gundam Mk. II (though that damned A Man In Black doesn't seem to care), using sources I wouldn't have a prayer of a chance of accessing. I don't suppose you could help do the same for the Psyco Gundam by any chance? It would give the article some more out-of-universe meat, and that should appease just about everyone who isn't currently on a POINT warpath against me. MalikCarr 23:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, I understand. I was always wondering what those little capsule toys with a Psyco Gundam head on a six-sided die were about. Thanks for the info on that one. Anyway, I wish you luck on finding any additional information for the article. Thanks again! MalikCarr 05:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I've included a paragraph about the "dice gundam" you described on my talk page, as well as a photo from Gundam Perfect Web that I thought seemed accurate. Giving your knowledge of the topic, would you say the current iteration suffices? MalikCarr 03:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Excellent, and thanks for the additional pronunciation - always looking to get more content. Thanks again. MalikCarr 05:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

WP Gundum
Ahhh - I have gotten too carried away in proving them wrong. Thank you for pointing out the project.GundamsRus 03:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Gundam Mk. II
I apologize for coming to harass you again, but A Man In Black's edit warring has left the Mk. II's page protected in a garbage version once again. Seeing the page protected in its current format, despite the fact that he's now violated the 3RR twice on the same article, is starting to grate on my faith in the protection system. To wit, I've put up an editprotected template to request it be returned to the previous revision that Jtrainor, L-Zwei and I would rather have.

Seeing as you've contributed to this article (and not endorsed AMIB's version as far as I know), would you be in favor of such a revision? As I predicted, the AMIB/GundamsRus camp has called into question the existence of the "consensus" I continue to claim (A Man In Black enjoys marginalizing WP:Gundam editors, I guess) on the talk page. Assuming that I've made the proper conclusions on your views (please correct me if I am mistaken - I don't want to inaccurately reflect your position), would you care to re-affirm my statements as such? It would be much appreciated.

Once again, I apologize for wasting your time on this miserable edit war. I've been thinking of having this account deleted and forming a new one so I could start doing productive work without having A Man In Black and GundamsRus there within a few hours to wreck them up... MalikCarr (talk) 06:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gundam firefighting.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Gundam firefighting.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Seraphimblade Talk to me 16:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Seriously Myth, where you get that info? (Turn A's Moonlight Butterfly)
As I said, it contradicted by event in show which they sometime use Moonlight Butterfly without other present. L-Zwei (talk) 17:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Still looking for episode number. Though I'm aware it might be my mis-impression. L-Zwei (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Gundam Mk. II, Part the Second
I'm a bit confused by the edit summary - what's going on with the infobox and the intro? Everything seems to be in order from my perspective, but if it isn't displaying right on your end that should be investigated. Can you send me a screencap or something? MalikCarr (talk) 07:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh. I thought we were talking about something serious, like the infobox covering over text or something. Hrm, I thought I put those spaces in with my version prior to the page protection... MalikCarr (talk) 08:34, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, is that all? I thought it was discouraged because it's irritating to have your contributions all be reverting someone else, as opposed to doing something constructive or helpful to the project as a whole. MalikCarr (talk) 09:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

FF VII
Sephiroth is a playable character as well, the memory scene has a part where you can use Sephiroth as a Lv 50 character in the game. MythSearchertalk 06:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah. Forgot about that stupid dream/flashback scene. Changed it to "main playabke".--SeizureDog (talk) 07:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:VX2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:VX2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, Mythsearcher, please add a FUR quick to this so Betacommand goes away. Jtrainor 21:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:VX2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:VX2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Sup
Merry Christmas, man. Jtrainor (talk) 17:22, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Akira Ookouchi.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Akira Ookouchi.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Asuna Kagurazaka.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Asuna Kagurazaka.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Ayaka Yukihiro.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Ayaka Yukihiro.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Chachamaru Karakuri.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Chachamaru Karakuri.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Chao Lingshen1.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Chao Lingshen1.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Chisame Hasegawa.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Chisame Hasegawa.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Chizuru Naba.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Chizuru Naba.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Evangeline A.K. McDowell.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Evangeline A.K. McDowell.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Fumika Narutaki.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Fumika Narutaki.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Fuuka Narutaki.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Fuuka Narutaki.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Haruna Saotome.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Haruna Saotome.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Kaede Nagase.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Kaede Nagase.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Kazumi Asakura.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Kazumi Asakura.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Konoka Konoe.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Konoka Konoe.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Ku Fei.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Ku Fei.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima M40A1.GIF
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima M40A1.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Madoka Kugimiya.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Madoka Kugimiya.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Mana Tatsumiya.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Mana Tatsumiya.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Misa Kakizaki.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Misa Kakizaki.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Misora Kasuga.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Misora Kasuga.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Natsumi Murakami.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Natsumi Murakami.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Nodoka Miyazaki.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Nodoka Miyazaki.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima PGM HecateII.GIF
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima PGM HecateII.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima PSG-1.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima PSG-1.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Satomi Hakase.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Satomi Hakase.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Satsuki Yotsuba.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Satsuki Yotsuba.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Setsuna Sakurazaki.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Setsuna Sakurazaki.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Yuuna Akashi.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Yuuna Akashi.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima Zazie Rainyday.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima Zazie Rainyday.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Negima dualDE.GIF
Thanks for uploading Image:Negima dualDE.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)