User talk:Myxomatosis/archive

Re: Motion City Soundtrack
Thank you very much! I appreciate it. &mdash;tilde 01:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:BCR.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BCR.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. feydey 20:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Always add a link to the originating web page, so that copyright information can be confirmed. See Publicity_photos for information what are Publicity photos. For more help use my talk page. feydey 09:38, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

TSOAF on EVR
The Sound of Animals Fighting's newest release will be on Equal Vision Records. I'm on the EVR street team, they already have stickers and stuff for it. Ask Craig, Anthony, or any of them yourself sometime. Reiver 17:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

re:re:tsoaf
Hey, well I understand that, do you think you could just trust additions made to the article by me in the future? I was even the one who started it, I know alot about this band, and do alot of street team promotion for them. Reiver 21:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

AbsolutePunk
Please see Wikipedia's guidelines for articles about websites (Notability (websites)). Currently the article does not provide proofs that AbsolutePunk meets any of the criteria. --Fritz S. (Talk) 10:12, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Hey
I fixed up the Warped Tour page. You should take a look and see if you like it... Dark jedi requiem 07:46, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I changed it again. lol, I spelled it Warped tour

Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Gl e n T C 13:13, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Ap.net
You are well aware what the blanking was in reference to. Even if you believe the claims to be false it is still controversial and deserves to be in there (on the flip side we have a section dedicated to their charity work so it is balanced) However, I have rewritten the controversy part so it's crystal clear these are merely allegations from another site, and not fact. Hope that's ok. - Gl e n T C 03:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

List of long albums with long titles
I did a search, and it looks like, no, there isn't one right now. You may start one if you like! -- Gbeeker 10:31, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Sum 41
...are you serious? damnit, why couldn't have waited until they finished warped tour? :P i love sum 41. The Kids Aren&#39;t Alright 19:51, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

AfD
Hi! Your article List of albums with particularly long titles has been nominated for deletion. Just thought you might like to know. The Disco King 20:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Underoath
It is people like you that hurt wikipedia. the last revision that was made was better written and more informative than the previous one, yet you changed it ALL back just because the word Christian was removed. Truth be told, prior to Chasing Safety, Underoath had released 3 albums, not 2, as the edit YOU put back on states. You don't have the facts, and you are threatening with your dictatorial behavior what could be a very good thing.

RX Bandits Wikipedia
How are any of the changes I made on the Rx Bandits page useless?!?! That took a long time!

As soon as I have time, I'm changing it back because it was infinitely more informative than what's up right now.

Underoath
factual information, of course, is necessary. thats why i invite you to edit the article to mention the bands christianity. im not trying to hide that. but lyrical content or band members' beliefs do not constitute genre or style of music. it is the music that is classified and defines a band. johnny cash, u2 and coldplay all are alike in the fact that they are not classified as a christian music band, although the lyrical content can sometimes be ambiguously similar to that of current underoath. i can see that you are adamant, and my will is not up to this fight. i dont have enough time. i will allow this true (they are christians) yet biased (the term "christian band") information to persist on the page.

Stop pipe linking 2006 in music
Stop pipe linking 2006 in music in the Rx Bandits album article. I am aware that this is a music article, but you obviously are not aware that there are guidelines that say that you are not supposed to do that:

from WP:PIPE
 * Please note that links to "year-in-x" articles (such as 2003 in film) should be labeled accordingly, and not with just the year. See Manual of Style (dates and numbers), WikiProject Music standards, Wikipedia talk:Music standards archive 1 and Talk:Bad Religion for discussion and further details on this.

from WikiProject_Music_standards §4
 * Don't use piped links to the "year in music" articles (i.e. do not write "the Beatles released Please Please Me in 1963"). Instead, sparingly use parentheses after years mentioned in the article, such as "The Beatles released Please Please Me in 1963 (see 1963 in music)".  In discography charts or other specialized forms, it is acceptable to use non-piped links to the year in music articles.

Also, pipe linking the year as you did will not work properly with the automatic date formatting according to the user preferences ( 27 June 2006 to e.g. June 27, 2006) --HarryCane 16:18, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Might I suggest that you check out the links in your welcome message on top of your talk page. Getting personal is really not necessary, especially when you are wrong about this. --HarryCane 17:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism warning
Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. --Fritz S. (Talk) 08:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Rx Bandits
Yeah, I'm sure it's out. I'm holding it in my hands right now... :) They released it on June 27 for purchase on their homepage and at their concerts. The only reason it's taking them this long (October 10, I believe) to get it in stores is that it's on their own label and they need to sort out distribution issues. --HarryCane 11:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:TSOAD-PROMO.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TSOAD-PROMO.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 01:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Your image
My apologies. I didn't see the link because someone had vandalized the page. I didn't remove the link myself. --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 01:46, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

List of The Office (U.S. TV series) episodes
Why do you keep removing relevant information from List of The Office (U.S. TV series) episodes? Qutezuce 08:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

List of The Office (U.S. TV series) episodes
Once again I am going to ask you: why do you keep removing relevant, properly sourced information from List of The Office (U.S. TV series) episodes? Qutezuce 23:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The information is not on the main office page, I looked. Someone probably disagreed with your edits moving that information there, like I did. Why don't you take a lot on the main page again, the information is not there. Didn't you read my comment in the edit summary reverting your change saying that the information was not in the main page? Why didn't you even look then? Instead you reverted my change and some other unrelated changes. It bothers me months later because you are simply removing the information, not moving it as you think you are doing. That information doesn't fit in with the main office page, it is very specific to the episodes, which is why it goes on the episodes page. Qutezuce 00:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)