User talk:Mz7/Archive 4

Rollback
Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please take note of the following:
 * Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
 * Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
 * Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
 * Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
 * Please read Help:Reverting and Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
 * You can test Rollback at New admin school/Rollback
 * You can display the userbox or the  top icon on your user page
 * If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Protection requests
Hi, for your requests at RfPP, many of them have been declined but the vandal was blocked. If there is a vandal, warn and after 4 warnings, report at AIV or the 3RR noticeboard. For your last request, it seems good. Ebe 123  → report 00:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds about right. Thank you so much for the tip!--Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 03:05, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

CSD for Imran Nyazee
Just a note that I removed the CSD template from Imran Nyazee and redirected the page to Imran Khan Nyazee (which was where the page was moved) instead. I'm not sure why the original author blanked the page, but it seems like a valid redirect. Thanks. wctaiwan (talk) 14:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah there was also another one the author did was Pirkhayat which was actually deleted through A3 by another admin. Thanks for the notice! ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 15:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America
Hello Michaelzeng7. I am just letting you know that I deleted The Holy Eastern Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in North America, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. It was definitely not vandalism. Thank you. Tikiwont (talk) 16:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, hmm. OK, I thought it was vandalism. Thanks for letting me know! ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 17:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Asian Americans
— Preceding unsigned comment added by RightCowLeftCoast (talk • contribs) 22:08, February 25, 2012 (EST)‎

Reg. central board of direct taxes page.
Hi, I understand that previous article was removed for G12. But I intend to work on it over the weekends with original research and content. Can you restore the old page and stop redirecting it to Taxation in india? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vence1234 (talk • contribs) 07:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what you mean by adding it with "original research and content," Wikipedia has a policy cannot accept original research as the content should stay verifiable. Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia, it is to editors like you who make a difference and create the information that is required for Wikipedia to be a true encyclopedia, but it is also up editors like you to keep the article content encyclopedic. The reseaon the article redirects to that article is because there is a section there about your article's topic. If you would like to rewrite the article, go ahead, make sure its notable though. I don't understand why you would want the deleted article content restored, it was a blatant copyright infringement anyway. Thank you again! ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 23:48, 26 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Just to let you know, I highly discourage you from redoing that article. It was already userfied to you. And I feel that the section at Taxation in India is good enough. Please take this advice seriously, thanks! ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 23:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Hmm.. I am just confused. What to do about the statuatory bodies then? Their functions are mandated in the statute and so is their structure. If i write them from the Act it is seen as Copying. Whats the alternative? I cannot write otherwise it would be incorrect.Please advice me. I have been following this particular organization for quite sometime and think it is not adequately represented in the Wiki sections. Vence1234 (talk) 00:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for putting it in my sandbox. Will work on giving it a decent acceptable shape and would request you again. 00:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vence1234 (talk • contribs)


 * Thanks for cooperating. --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 21:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Ada Lovelace
Not a BLP violation, just common-or-garden vandalism. Cusop Dingle (talk) 22:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, OK, Thanks for telling me. I'll be more careful next time. --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 22:28, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: February 2012
Hey, no hard feelings. Thank you for at least making sure/catching an error that I hadn't. Likewise, you're more than welcome to remove this edit once you've received the message. —SpaceCow4 (talk - contribs) 04:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for kind words ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 04:11, 2 March 2012 (UTC)