User talk:Mz7/Archive 5

RE:Pterosaur and GA
Thank you for clearing up those points I raised in the GAR quickly, and for creating such a good article in the first place - I've always had an interest in prehistoric flora and fauna. Whenever someone's article receives a review, they are encouraged to then carry out a review themselves, in order to keep the system running. I believe I saw you already carrying out a review, but nevertheless if you feel the desire to do another that would be wonderful. All the best. MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 16:58, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for kind words. I'll one day review another article for good article criteria again. Thank you! ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 00:27, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

inre WIikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reg Gorman
Subsequent to your delete !vote, others have come forward to show the actor as meeting WP:ENT and WP:GNG. Also, the stub that was first nominated is itself being improved to better serve the project. As the nominator has tacitly withdrawn his nomination  through recent statements "People have dug up a lot of sources. This has convinced me that notability can be established for the article," and "I think there's enough material around to create an article where notability is established so I am satisfied," and "I'm pretty satisfied that an article which establishes notability firmly can be created now", and due to the fact that the article itself has begun being improved to reflect this actor's career through available sources, might you yourself perhaps consider changing your opinion? Best,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:43, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for re-visiting.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

New MfD on User:TrueBlood12...
... is here, since you contributed to the last discussion I thought I'd notify you. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 11:49, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, when I saw the MfD, it was already closed as Speedy Delete. Thanks for telling me anyway! ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 16:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)