User talk:Mzaki

BC Forests Districts/Regions list reversion
I had to delete your updated list of these on List_of_forest_regions_and_districts_of_British_Columbia because you provided no cites, also wiped redlinks which hopefully will become data pages on the stats and geography/botany of each region. I've placed it on Talk:List_of_forest_regions_and_districts_of_British_Columbia for now, you can place the cites there; once that's done I'll be glad to restore it to the article.Skookum1 (talk) 10:03, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * each item should be cited so authors can go to the particular page easily. Other than that, restore the redlinks; and if it's a topic that interests you, start writing up the Region/District articles.Skookum1 (talk) 10:27, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * the old maps/cites for the former list remain there; they should be dated as "before 2011" or something like that. Eventually Category:X in the Y Forest District or /Forest Region are viable, especially for things often academically cited as such, e.g. lakes and mountains, which do not belong in Regional District (municipal) cateogries.Skookum1 (talk) 10:43, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Restoration of redirect
I have restored the redirect from Phenol–chloroform extraction to Acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction, which you had, for some reason, removed. The article has existed under its earlier title for over seven years, and it is entirely likely that in that time one or more people may have saved a link to it under that title, so removing the link may be unhelpful. If you believe that the redirect should not be allowed to remain in existence, it will be more constructive request deletion, because if a page is deleted at least someone searching for it is confronted with a message telling them of the page move and subsequent deletion of the redirect, so they can find where the article. Simply blanking the page, on the other hand, means that anyone searching for it is given no information at all about what has happened to it. However, unless there is some special reason why you think the existence of the link is harmful, it is likely to be more helpful to simply let the redirect remain in place, so that anyone searching for the article under its old title will be taken straight to the article under its new title.. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:58, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited McIlvaine buffer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)