User talk:N.chiaki/sandbox

Workplace Romance Notes: -bias -effects on productivity -what are possible occurrences that may happen before, during, and after the relationship -relationships between subordinates, superiors, or coworkers (workplace rules) -spouses in the same workplace -interactions between coworkers Emily Roeder (talk) 04:43, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
Factors that influence romantic attraction are arousal and evaluation of overt body characteristics. While both factors of interpersonal and romantic attraction are considered separate entities, they both play a role in the development of the relationship.
 * Add more links to other pages (for example, link readers to the pages for romantic, sexual, and combination partnership)
 * The first 'chunk' seems to bounce around a little bit. Consider moving some of the terms into more of an organized order (you have sexual and combination partnership together, but a new section on romantic partnership).
 * Describe if the responses are negative or positive (you just mention that job productivity, etc. are responses to workplace relationships, but specify if they are positive, negative, and/ or both). You mentioned it at the bottom of this section, but it may be worth it to mention it at the top as well.
 * Provide background information on the features discussed under 'responses to workplace relationships'
 * Cite this section if possible: Factors that influence interpersonal attraction are proximity, repeated exposure, attitude similarity, and performance appraisals.
 * Consider editing the last sentence under the first section of the article (specify who 'those involved' are; managers? employees?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cporter32 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Elizabeth Clair peer review
Overall, this article is a good start to the whole idea of workplace romance. The part talking about work spouse seems a little short compared to everything else. It also seems a little choppy, just smooth it out instead of bouncing from topic to topic. For example, work spouse right to sexual partnerships. Also, it’s mentioned that there are only 3 categories, but then mention work spouse making it 4. When talking about responses to Workplace relationships, what do you mean by “clash” when a workplace relationship is occurring. What are some examples of that to better understand what you’re all saying. In the section saying “In fact, those who date superiors…” make sure to put that “unfair advantages they might receive”, so one isn’t assuming that all who date superiors will always get benefits. Clair.elizabeth (talk) 13:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Brady Schneider Peer Review
Overall I thought the article was very well put together. You did a very good job at remaining neutral about the topic throughout the article. You also did a great job at taking full advantage of your resources by making an attachment to your respected source for each claim that you made. If there was anything I believe you could work on a little bit, it would be sentence structure and possibly more examples regarding your claims. When I was reading your article, it almost felt like I was reading off a list. While you made good points, there was an absence of any type of transition from point to point. Adding some examples of types of romances in workplace so people get an idea of real life example might also help the reader understand the topic as well. --Schneide.brady (talk) 13:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Madeline Maas Peer Review
This article does a good job of giving unbias neutral information. The sourcing is good, with all the claims, being presented with a reliable source. The article is a little dry and choppy. Not the easiest article to read, the sentence structure would improve the flow of the article. The content is good and neutral. You could go more into the effects of workplace romance. For example, the performance or output of work that comes from those involved in a workplace romance. Or other effects on the organization as a whole when workplace romance is present. There is a need for some examples so that the information given can be applied to situations that could resonate with others to help apply the concept as a whole. The article is headed in the right direction. Maddi.maas (talk) 13:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)