User talk:N0b0d33sp3c1al

August 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Black Mafia Family have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Black Mafia Family was changed by N0b0d33sp3c1al (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.900138 on 2023-08-26T23:04:12+00:00

September 2023
Hello, I'm StonyBrook. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Folk Nation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Stony Brook  babble 09:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:24, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Black Mafia Family, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 23:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


 * it was literally the FBI vault, pretty sure it was reliable. N0b0d33sp3c1al (talk) 14:16, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * And no, it's not. They wrote they sent it to all logical fields, and didn't list any, or state anything about a list or reports. And why would a report be sent there unless there was activity/suspicions of activity there? N0b0d33sp3c1al (talk) 14:23, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   14:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Instead of reverting my edit and telling me to look at the talk page....you should look at the talk page. I explained the reasons yesterday, long before your revert. You are basing this on a lot of guesswork. There is a RS stating clearly they were shut down. You need consensus to make a change like this. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No, there is a singular, outdated source stating that only 30 of 500 are arrested. So not only does your own source yourself prove you wrong, but the source we've been giving you is literally from the official government website, has BMF, members and associates In the title, and literally states that J bo was a part of this. Fun fact: just cause you arrest a couple of high ranking members, doesn't mean the gang fall. The GDs, crips, VLs, BDs, and Many more are still around despite having their top members fall, BMF is no different, especially since the majority of documented members weren't even arrested in said incident. ONLY 30 MEMBERS. do you really expect them to fall just for that? N0b0d33sp3c1al (talk) 21:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Fun fact: If you bothered to look at more than a few userboxes I put on my page for fun, you'd see I've edited a load of gang articles, including ones that had top leaders arrested or killed. Don't pretend like you're going to school me on gang operations. You really don't know as much about me as you think you do. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Niteshift36. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)


 * What did I do that isn't "civil"? Prove you wrong? And why are you policing your own talk? And doing it abusively as I have wrote nothing that could be offensive other than "is it that youre desperate for control of a wiki page" and that you LOOK, not are, stupid and desperate denying literal government evidence, and all things that could be seen as such i already did and still do apologize for. You seem to be abusing power. And btw, the fact you've "edited a load of gang articles" doesn't prove anything, so I don't know why you added that. In fact, you using "you don't really know about me as you think you do" and "I've edited loads of gang pages" proves youre probably obsessed, even more proof you might in fact be desperate for control. It also proves you probably live and grew up in an upper class area, and that you have no reason to be this obsessed AT ALL. Also, just so you know, I've taken screenshots of the situation. And by the way, I know you're into star wars, even calling yourself a "Jedi", I know you're skeptical about global warming, you're a conservative, that you're probably, just probably, trolling, based on the fact i know youre a troll, based on "trolls will do troll things", meaning you cant be trusted anyways, that you're a father, that you enjoy pistol shooting, and many more. You know what I can't find on you though? The part where you're a gang expert. And either way, in this particular case, you're still wrong. Please, PLEASE read all the sources, search up the term "bmf new arrests J bo" and PLEASE try to throw away your old source and accept the new ones. The proof is there. You just need to learn to accept it. And again, I'm EXTREMELY sorry for anything that sounds rude, it's not supposed to be that way it's just impatience. Your source says nothing about the entire gang falling, only stating 30 members, and gangs are known to bounce back quick. Not only that, the recent incident includes J bo, and I have multiple sources saying they haven't. I know they were high ranking members, but that doesn't really matter to them. Not trying to be rude, just trying to tell you that your source isn't really proving anything. Just because the title says "knockout blow", doesn't mean they actually dealt one. I'm going to be editing it back, and I'll provide multiple sources from multiple times, and I will leave your source, but you gotta understand they MOST DEFINITELY survived a measly 30 members being lost. N0b0d33sp3c1al (talk) 22:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cash Flow Posse


A tag has been placed on Cash Flow Posse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Chaotıċ Enby  (talk · contribs) 19:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)


 * In addition to the issues listed above, the article was a blatant WP:BLP violation. You cannot create wholly unsourced articles, let along make make incriminating statements about individuals.-- Ponyo bons mots 19:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cash Flow Posse


A tag has been placed on Cash Flow Posse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Chaotıċ Enby  (talk · contribs) 19:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * At least this time it avoids the BLP issues by not naming any specific person, but doesn't fix the lack of asserted importance/notability, and the lack of sources. Chaotıċ Enby   (talk · contribs) 19:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cash Flow Posse


A tag has been placed on Cash Flow Posse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ForsythiaJo (talk) 20:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Block notice
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ponyo bons mots 20:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If you attempt to recreate this Cash Flow Posse. again, I will block your account indefinitely.-- Ponyo bons mots 20:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)