User talk:NAVREF

Merge
We do no SHOUT not even in article titles. I do not think we need separate articles for NAVREF and the general concept of such a foundation. &mdash; RHaworth 19:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page National Association of Veterans' Research and Education Foundations has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. 4twenty42o (talk) 19:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page National Association of Veterans' Research and Education Foundations. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. 4twenty42o (talk) 19:45, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * You cannot just delete content because you do not like how it is written. You may propose deletion, edit within the scope of reliable sources or discuss changes on the talk. If you continue, however, to delete information you are vandalizing an article. This includes blanking the page, placing personal comments on the page and edit warring. Please reconsider your approach. - 4twenty42o (talk) 19:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did to National Association of Veterans' Research and Education Foundations. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  El em esh Talk 20:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * User NAVREF, the author, blanked the page. This is commonly interpreted as a db-g7 request.  — Athaenara  ✉  20:06, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. HarlandQPitt (talk) 20:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

National Association of Veterans' Research and Education Foundations
Hey there, Dont worry about the page, its on its way to being deleted. Just wait for an admin to come anlong and do it. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask them-either at my talk page or by placing on your talk page (including your question as well). If you want, you may read the introduction to using wikipedia. There are a lot of policies here, but they can all be summarized by these two- always cite what you add to an article, and try to keep a neutral point of view. Good luck! Tim1357 (talk) 20:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:NAVREF/NAVREF


A tag has been placed on your user page, User:NAVREF/NAVREF, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 05:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is against Wikipedia's policy: an account is for an individual, not a group. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising service.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)