User talk:NBCfootballju

Third opinion
Hi. Regarding your request at Third opinion, I wanted to point out to you that the board is specifically for cases only involving two editors. There seem to be something in the neighborhood of five editors already involved at Talk:Loyola_Law_School. If consensus is not forthcoming, you may wish to ask for further assistance at Requests for comment, as suggested by the dispute resolution guidelines. Given that it involves a school, I would probably list it at Requests for comment/Economy, trade, and companies, but some might suggest other placement. Good luck! --Moonriddengirl 19:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * With regards to your note on my talk page, you might wish to review "how to list a dispute" at Third opinion. You'll note that the first instruction says, "If, after discussion, only two editors are involved, you may list the dispute below in the Active Disagreements section. Otherwise, please follow other methods in the dispute resolution process." (Bold included in original.) I am not attempting to obstruct your efforts to find resolution to your dispute, but I am attempting to help you find the right home for it. Wikipedia:Third opinion has a very narrow and specific focus. --Moonriddengirl 19:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Good luck. :) --Moonriddengirl 19:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)