User talk:NBasham1/sandbox/Madrid

Spelling/ Grammar: - Meets standard; the first paragraph (government structure) had little to no spelling/ grammatical errors. The second paragraph (current composition) had some spacing issues that need to be revisited.

Language: - Does not meet standard; unfortunately, the language throughout this piece seems, to me, a little regurgitated and informal for your chosen topic. The information that you are trying to convey is good, but given your topic you may want to think about using more professional wording/ language.

Organization: - Does not meet standard; while reading this piece I noticed that each sentence seems like its own bullet point. There is not much flow from sentence to sentence. Create a more dynamic flow between sentences with background information.

Coding: - Exceeds standard.

Validity: - Meets standard; the topic you have chosen is a good one, but the information is a little bland and needs to be more in depth to give some this piece more validity.

Completion: - Nearly meets standard; this piece doesn't seem "complete" from my point of view because of the points I mentioned above. It needs more information within each paragraph and a more professional language and better organized to be complete.

Relevance: - Meets standard; there are some points that don't seem to fit in, but if you take my advice I think that all this information will be relevant.

Sources: - Exceeds standard; great sources from variety of reliable sources.

Citations: - Nearly meets standard; after almost every sentence there seems to be a citation. As I stated above, put "filler" information into your edit that doesn't need a direct citation to "exceed standard"

References: - Meets standards.

--Forrestbevington (talk) 15:38, 9 November 2018 (UTC)