User talk:NBasham1/sandbox/Stockholm

12/3/2018 Evaluation by Forrest C. Bevington

 * Points: 39
 * Grade: 97.5

Spelling/Grammar: Nearly Meets Standards

 * There is a spelling error where you said "county" when maybe you meant to say "country," but if that is what you mean to say you might want to try to re-word it because it didn't make much sense when I read it. There also seem to me some grammatical errors here and there in the first section.
 * I think that "High Tech" needs to be hyphenated throughout the section. Multiple spelling/ grammar errors in the high tech section.
 * I saw a few minor grammatical errors throughout the paper, may want to run it through grammerely and/ or go over it again to fix it.

Language: Nearly Meets Standards

 * The language was decent. The only thing that I noticed was that in some paragraphs the sentences not really flow together. It sounded kind of like each sentence should have been its own bullet point. They aren't bad sentences, they just need to be re-worded to create a better flow.

Organization: Meets Standards

 * The organization was really good. Each section didn't seem to be a major part of another so it doesn't matter what order they are in.
 * You could add some media like pictures or graphs to make it more lively.

Coding: Exceeds Standards

 * Good job

Validity: Meets Standards

 * Good information, the statistics helped you bring clarity to the points you mentioned

Completion: Meets Standards

 * The information that you provided was good, and after reading through it, it doesn't seem like you left anything important/ relevant out.
 * What you could do to make this better is finish up each section with a quick 1-2 sentence summary of each section or maybe if a certain section has relevance to the one below it write a sentence or two that rolls right into that section

Relevance: Exceeds Standards

 * All information/ data seems to be relevant to the points that you made.

Sources: Exceeds Standards

 * Great quality sources with some scholarly ones mixed in there.

Citations: Exceeds Standards

 * Perfect citations.

References: Meets Standards

 * It seems that you are missing some authors in your references/ citations. I know that not every article has an identified author, but may want to go back to your sources and double check.