User talk:NCCL2310

Morphine
Hello. You added statements to morphine. Most of what you added had no source. Please provide a citation for whatever you add to health articles. The citation you did add did not match the statement you added. You said something like "morphine was used recently" which could not have been in the source if you cite a 19th century medical paper. If you like, say "Morphine was used in the 19th century for..." Thanks for contributing.  Blue Rasberry  (talk)  13:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of XLNT


A tag has been placed on XLNT requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Smileguy91 Spread the knowledge! 01:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of PC-DCL for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PC-DCL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PC-DCL until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 04:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

XLNT
Hi, I have fixed the typos in the XLNT talk page. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of HackMan Suite
Hello, NCCL2310. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, HackMan Suite, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sulfurboy (talk) 21:09, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mariphasa lupina lumina Wirth 1938


The article Mariphasa lupina lumina Wirth 1938 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * '''Non-notable, and poorly formed title. This is a fictional plant from Werewolf of London. The referenced scholarly article on the film (this link works better for me) first mentions the plant as 'Mariphasa Lupino Lumino", and notes 9 variants that have appeared in the script, as spoken in the film, and in other analyses of the film. None of the variants include "Wirth 1938". Attaching "Wirth 1938" seems to have started on the internet with this article.

"Mariphasa" and "Mariphasa lupina" might be reasonable redirects to the film. This fictional plant doesn't seem notable, and the current title is not a reasonable redirect to the film.'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plantdrew (talk) 06:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of PowerDesk


The article PowerDesk has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:NOTMANUAL; WP:PROMO."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)