User talk:NE2/VA renumberings


 * 1933
 * 2-7 assigned to major corridors:
 * 2 &larr; 50 (part), 421
 * 3 &larr; 37 (part), 827
 * 4 &larr; many many routes
 * 5 &larr; 39 (part), 41, 835
 * 6 &larr; 18, 19 (also a conflicting number)
 * 7 &larr; 37 (part), 54 (part), 822, 826
 * 8-14 assigned to conflicting numbers:
 * 8 &larr; 23
 * 9 &larr; 25
 * 12 &larr; 17 (the parts that didn't become new major corridor 4 or extended existing 42)
 * 14 &larr; 29, 38 (part), 600 (part)
 * major single-district routes or portions of routes that mostly became others - roughly clustered, but 44 and 52-54 don't fit well:
 * 18 &larr; 800
 * 20 &larr; 316, 702
 * 22 &larr; 39 (part)
 * 24 &larr; 43 (part), 207, 306 (part), 308, 325 - why didn't this remain 43?
 * 26 &larr; 306 (part), 307, 327
 * 31 &larr; 510, 542, 547
 * 32 &larr; 509, 538 - how is this a major route?
 * 33 &larr; 508
 * 34 &larr; 401
 * 36 &larr; 408, 409, 435
 * 37 &larr; 407
 * 38 &larr; 406
 * 39 &larr; 304 (part)
 * 40 &larr; 20 - why?
 * 41 &larr; 301 (part)
 * 43 &larr; 215, 320
 * 44 &larr; 419 - this doesn't fit the rough clustering
 * 46 &larr; 12 (part)
 * 47 &larr; 434
 * 52 &larr; 505
 * 53 &larr; 506
 * 54 &larr; 39 (part), 50 (part)
 * Numbering by district began with 59. The entire lengths of two two-digit routes were renumbered into this system:
 * 94 &larr; 58
 * 97 &larr; 47


 * 1940
 * matched Kentucky:
 * 4 &larr; 84
 * 4 already free (had become US 33)
 * 66 &larr; 65, 70 (part)
 * 66 free from becoming 70
 * 160 &larr; 67
 * 160 &rarr; 271
 * 271 free from becoming 84


 * matched North Carolina:
 * 16 &larr; 88, 92 (NC extended 16 over, replacing their 681)
 * 16 &rarr; 27
 * 27 free from becoming 170
 * 32 &larr; 10 (part)
 * 32 &rarr; 88
 * 88 free from becoming 16
 * 37 &larr; 53
 * 37 &rarr; 106
 * 106 free from becoming 87
 * 46 &larr; 34
 * 46 &rarr; 92
 * 92 free from becoming 16
 * 87 &larr; 106 (NC extended 87 over, replacing part of their 54)
 * 87 &rarr; 78
 * 78 free from becoming 91
 * 89 &larr; 96
 * 89 already free (had become secondary)
 * 96 &larr; 49 (part) (both states chose a single new number, NC replacing 562)
 * 96 free from becoming 89
 * 170 &larr; 27 (NC extended 170 over, replacing part of their 34)
 * 170 &rarr; 238
 * 238 free from becoming 9
 * 258 &larr; 158 (NC swapped US 258 and US 158)
 * 258 &rarr; 158


 * matched Tennessee:
 * 70 &larr; 66
 * 70 &rarr; 64 (existing), 66 (part)
 * 64's rerouting left behind a piece which became 65
 * 65 free from becoming 66
 * 75 &larr; 77 (was supposed to match, but TN never changed 44 to 75)
 * 75 &rarr; 77
 * 91 &larr; 78, 81
 * 91 &rarr; 81
 * 81 also replaced part of US 58, which was realigned to replace 305


 * matched West Virginia:
 * 9 &larr; 238
 * 9 &rarr; 120, 123
 * 120 &rarr; 245 (why was 120 brought into this? why not simply use 245 for part of 9?)
 * 245 &rarr; 234 (existing) (this change made as part of extending 17 to MD, which replaced part of 234)
 * 123 already free (had become facility route 320)??
 * 39 &larr; 501 (WV extended 39 over, replacing their 43)
 * 39 &rarr; 47 (existing)
 * 59 &larr; 261
 * 59 free from becoming 83
 * 83 &larr; 59
 * 83 &rarr; 67
 * 67 free from becoming 160
 * 84 &larr; 271
 * 84 free from becoming 4
 * 259 (existing) &larr; 275 (matched WV 58, which was renumbered 259 to match the other piece of VA 259)
 * 522 &larr; 3 (part), 7 (part), 49 (part) (proposed extension of US 522 from MD through WV; not sure if WV renumbered its side simultaneously)
 * 3 (orphaned part) &rarr; 261
 * 261 free from becoming 59

34, 53, 275, and 305 were newly free.

only the new nonmatching numbers (other than simple swaps): I don't see any real pattern here.
 * 27 16: lowest number chosen for long route
 * 34
 * 53
 * 65 64 (part)
 * 67 83
 * 78 87
 * 88 32
 * 92 46 (part)
 * 96: new number chosen by both states to match
 * 106 37
 * 120/123 9
 * 238 170
 * 245 120
 * 261 3 (part)
 * 271 160
 * 275
 * 305