User talk:NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM

Thiagarajar college
Hello,, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, Thiagarajar college, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Thiagarajar College. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:


 * 1) a link to the article you copied from
 * 2) the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 16:12, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your Teahouse question has been answered
You can find it here --Tito Dutta (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

The Teahouse Turns One!
It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


 * --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Madurai Junction railway station. ''This goes for the same just as before. looking at the history of your talk page, you are a recipient of numerous warning from multiple users. It's high time you stop or you would end up being blocked by admins.'' &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 08:00, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Madurai Junction railway station shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 08:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

block now NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM (talk) 08:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Spend your time in something useful like understanding policies of wikipedia instead of irrationally reverting. It's high time you stop and get acquainted with WP:NOT. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 08:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Wow! Go ahead, vandalize and degrade the quality of the article by adding unworthy stuff just like you have been doing on Mysore. Your talk page history shows a whole number of warnings from various users and it just shows that you are adamant in adding what you feel is right and not as per the interests of the project! &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 08:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

whenever I made mistakes in wikipedia, then I accepted it and even apologised for the mistakes. but not for what you are doing? you better read the last comments which you wrote, that is about yourself not about me. you are the one doing vadalize and degrade the quality of the article by disruptive editing. NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM (talk) 08:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have learned from your mistakes, you wouldn't be adding content which is not notable and you wouldn't be receiving numerous warnings like you have been as is evident from the history of your talk page. This just shows that you are adamant and do not want to understand our policies and just want to add what you feel is right. Your reasons for reverting are just irrational. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 08:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

you have no quality to talk about learning from mistakes, first you read whatever you wrote here and follow that in your life, then come and preach others. NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM (talk) 17:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Madurai Junction railway station, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 14:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

if somebody has to be banned then it is you, because of having difference of opinion with me, you are destroying other people contributions in wikipedia like you did in Madurai Junction railway station NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM (talk) 14:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 16:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked for personal attacks and persistent reintroduction of unencyclopedic material., remember that it takes two to edit war, and that "final warnings" don't mean much if they're not final. Drmies (talk) 16:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ulaga Tamil Sangam for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ulaga Tamil Sangam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ulaga Tamil Sangam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 00:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)