User talk:NEWMANTRUEMAN

November 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ramzan Kadyrov— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)


 * This was not vandalism but rather the opposite, with even basic research on Ramzan Kadyrov you will see that The section I removed is rather irrelevant to many other things this man is notable for that are all absent from his wiki page. The section I removed was only character smearing and an act of vandalism on the page, irrelevant information that serves only to make him more unlikeable. Likely added by a user with political bias NEWMANTRUEMAN (talk) 02:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Ramzan Kadyrov
The Guardian and the the New York Times are by no means "tabloids". Jim1138 (talk) 08:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Lmao two months later they fully embraced the tabloid label, try researching things. NEWMANTRUEMAN (talk) 02:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Progressive stack has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Progressive stack was changed by NEWMANTRUEMAN (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954708 on 2017-12-15T20:26:40+00:00.

February 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ramzan Kadyrov. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Þjarkur (talk) 14:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


 * You state this two years after the edits were made and reverted... This was not vandalism but rather the opposite, with even basic research on Ramzan Kadyrov you will see that The section I removed is rather irrelevant to many other things this man is notable for that are all absent from his wiki page. The section I removed was only character smearing and an act of vandalism on the page, irrelevant information that serves only to make him more unlikeable. Likely added by a user with political bias NEWMANTRUEMAN (talk) 02:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)