User talk:NIH-SAVES-LIVES

7-Hydroxymitragynine‎
You keep adding unreliable content to this article, stating it is "published" by the NIH. It isn't; PUBMED is just a search engine which contains a load of stuff. If using PUBMED, you can check that the "Publication type" of any content is "Review", "Systematic review" or "Meta-analysis" to give a quick a rough indication that it is suitable. Please propose any further changes at Talk:7-Hydroxymitragynine‎ - if you continue edt warring you will likely be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 04:45, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Ambox notice.svg There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Guy (help!) 22:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * During your block, I suggest you read WP:BRD and WP:MEDRS. Please also read WP:Five pillars, referenced above. If you resume edit-warring and refusing to communicate with other editors after this block expires, the next block will be longer or indefinite. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 23:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Dude, you need to calm down. Your edit summaries are spectacularly inappropriate. First up, please don't use ALL CAPITALS, it's considered equivalent to shouting. Second, don't even think about making pseudo legal threats on Wikipedia. Third, you can email all you like, they will just send you right back to the talk page, because that's how Wikipedia works.
 * You need to post the text you want to include, on the Talk page. You then need to discuss it calmly and see what other Wikipedians think of it. And you need to assume good faith, because when stuff is removed form Wikipedia it is very rarely because the removing editor is an "INFORMATION TERRORIST", but because the content is not written the way Wikipedia writes content, or not based on the kinds of sources we consider reliable, especially for medical content. As to "WIKI WILL BE LOCKING THE PAGE", that would be done by an admin - someone like me, in fact. And I can tell you with fair confidence: it ain't going to happen. What's more likely is that your'll end up blocked permanently.
 * The only reason that hasn't happened already is because some of us think you're actually trying to help. But if you make the same edits again after you block expires, we're likely to take the view that you're not going to accept guidance, and that will be that, I'm afraid. Guy (help!) 14:03, 6 May 2020 (UTC)