User talk:NIHKZ

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  DGG ( talk ) 21:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

advice
As reviewing administrator, with respect to your edits to the article on George P. Chrousos, I alert you to our Conflict of Interest policy and the existence of our Style guidelines. Wikipedia is not a place to post CV's, but an encyclopedia, and we only provide the information that an encyclopedia would be expected to cover--even a moderately detailed list of papers, for example, is not appropriate here. As a rule, 4 or 5 are considered acceptable, and the usual course is to pick the most highly cited, giving the number of cites according to Science Citation Index. Please do this, and remove the others. I can and will do it if you do not, but it's your responsibility. Please also see of citation format and adjust the references in the text accordingly. Fora basic introduction to our article style, see our guide to writing Wikipedia articles; for more detail, read the relevant parts of  the free online version of How Wikipedia Works by Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, and Ben Yates (also available in print)--a truly excellent manual.  DGG ( talk ) 21:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to George P. Chrousos, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: George P. Chrousos was changed by NIHKZ (u) (t) deleting 7681 characters on 2010-07-02T18:08:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Additional Papers
A tag has been placed on Additional Papers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jimmy Pitt (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The Additional Papers page is now in User talk:NIHKZ/Additional Papers. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 19:15, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Reflist2
A tag has been placed on Template:Reflist2, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tagishsimon (talk) 23:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The deletion debate is at Templates for deletion/Log/2009 March 13. Why are you trying to use a template for the sort of information that's in this template? It's just the wrong thing to do. If these are citations for an article, they should be entered directory into the article and not transcluded via a template. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:18, 7 October 2010 (UTC)