User talk:NINpigNIN

--evrik (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Consistency
The Scouting in California article is a better model of what the state articles should look like. I have not had a chance to get to Ohio yet. --evrik (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree that upon a brief read-through the format of that page is much nicer than the Ohio page. Making Ohio match the California page is more about standardization than consistency.  Every other council heading on the Ohio page shows the council #.  The Ohio page should stay consistent within itself.  If the intent is to move the council # to the first line of text, then it should be done to all council entries not just one (imho). NINpigNIN (talk) 19:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, standardization, and consistency. Right now I'm still working on New York. Maybe we can tackle Ohio next ... I have 27 more to do. Also, one has to cross reference this page Talk:Scouting_in_Ohio with Defunct local councils of the Boy Scouts of America. --evrik (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Sounds like a plan. I'm willing to help out, let me know if there's any prep that can be done. NINpigNIN (talk) 13:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Look at this page. Give me your thoughts. Go ahead and edit there. --evrik (talk) 18:44, 7 January 2015 (UTC)