User talk:NIanni727/talk page tutorial

Hello
This is a talk page message. It's from me, User:Ian (Wiki Ed). You can tell who it's from because it's got my username and a timestamp at the end.--Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) (UTC)
 * And this is a reply, from User:Adam (Wiki Ed). It's indented, to show how it relates to the previous comment.--Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) (UTC)

Hello
This is a talk page message. It's from me, User:Ian (Wiki Ed). You can tell who it's from because it's got my username and a timestamp at the end.--Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) (UTC)
 * And this is a reply, from User:Adam (Wiki Ed). It's indented, to show how it relates to the previous comment.--Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) (UTC)
 * Hi! Can you give me any advice for improving this article?--NIanni727 (talk) 14:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Red Giants
The article I will be talking about is red giants. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything that I read in the red giant article is some how relevant to the article topic. The article begins with a brief explanation of what a red giant is and its main characteristics that you should know off the top. Something that I did find useful was the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram on the right hand side. The first sub-section in the red giant article was the characteristics of a red giant, which I found extremely helpful. Next was the evolution of a red giant, which helped me understand how they are what they are. They're is a little section under the evolution section that explains what happens to stars if they do not become red giants. This section was a very interesting read, but in my opinion was not needed in this article. The section underneath the evolution section is the planet section. The planet section has a notification on it that it needs to be updated, but other than that it was very informative. It discusses the prospects for habitability and the enlargement of planets. The last sections were the well known examples and a brief explanation as the sun as a red giant. The article ends with a list of all the references used in this article. Over all I found all of the information in the article to be relevant to the article topic.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I don't think there are any viewpoints that were overrepresented in this article, but there are a few sections that I felt were underrepresented. The characteristic and evolution section was presented well and was easy to understand. In the evolution section they even added a section about what happens to stars if they do not become red giants. The planet section was a little underrepresented, in my opinion. I would have liked to see a little more information on the enlargements of planets. The examples is also underrepresented. I would have liked a few more examples to help me better understand the concept fully. The section about the sun as a red giant was represented very well. It may have been shorter than most sections, but it was very clear. NIanni727 (talk) 03:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)