User talk:NJInce

Joseph Brant
At Joseph Brant, you added that he died at "Burlington Beach", but you did not add a source to support this, and Burlington Beach is not mentioned in the article. Could you explain? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


 * In the subsection "Death" the article states: "Joseph Brant died in his house at the head of Lake Ontario (site of what would become the city of Burlington, Ontario)." This location was historically called Burlington Beach, since the city of Burlington did not exist at the time. The hyperlink I included for Burlington Beach links to the Burlington, Ontario page.
 * I looked for a source online stating that Brant died at "Burlington Beach" but did not find one. This source says he died at "Wellington Square (now Burlington)".  What is your source to support that Brant died at "Burlington Beach"?  Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Joseph Brant called his home at the Head of Lake Ontario (today known as Burlington) "The Beach" (see for example Kelsay, Isabel Thompson (1984). Joseph Brant, 1743–1807, Man of Two Worlds. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0-8156-0182-1). He was the first resident in this area other than the Mississauga, so it wasn't known as anything other than "The Beach," except when it was called "Burlington Beach" to signify its proximity to Burlington Bay. Wellington Square was only founded three years after Brant died, see . I am not stating anything that is not already stated in the article. The place I said he died is the same place as in the section "Death." I am only clarifying that in 1807 the name for this place was Burlington Beach, while still linking to the modern community of Burlington. If this explanation does not satisfy you, please do not contact me here, but rather make your own independent edit on the article.
 * In other words, "Joseph Brant died in his house at the head of Lake Ontario (site of what would become the city of Burlington, Ontario)", as was stated in the article. The terms, "the head of Lake Ontario", "The Beach", and "Burlington Bay"--as were mentioned in the Kelsay book--weren't official "places", but words made up by Brant to describe the un-named place he was living. Calling it "Wellington Square" is also not correct--as you've pointed out--because this place was not yet named that.  Would you agree then, that calling this place by the unofficial Brant-invented place name "The Beach" is also not correct (because it really isn't a place)? Magnolia677 (talk) 20:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Excellent. This conversation feels more productive now. Burlington Beach actually was widely adopted as the name for the the place where Brant built his house. See for example Smith's 1846 Gazetteer of Upper Canada, or see this . It was widely used in British military dispatches during the War of 1812, as was Burlington Heights for the elevated spit of land at the opposite end of the bay. Unfortunately, Burlington Beach is not used much presently as a geographical expression, and a Google search will just turn up beaches in Burlington. Some variant on The Head-of-the-Lake as the location of Brant's death would be correct but not very specific, as this could refer to anywhere in what is today the greater Hamilton region. My solution to this problem was to give as his place of death a toponym someone in the early 19th century would have used (including Brant himself), but then to also provide the hyperlink to the present day city of Burlington within the boundaries of which his death took place. This may be an overly creative way to maintain historical accuracy while also helping contemporary readers, but I do not see an alternative solution. Creating a Wikipedia page for Burlington Beach (which is a major geographic feature in Lake Ontario) might be helpful in the long term, but is not an immediate fix.
 * Ah, ok. Well sourced indeed. The problem now is that "Burlington Beach" leads to an article that never once mentions "Burlington Beach", so it should not link there, per MOS:LINKCLARITY.  Are you able to create a redirect? Magnolia677 (talk) 21:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I can understand that a link shouldn't lead to an article that doesn't contain the words. No, I haven't made a redirect before. Perhaps the easiest solution is just to the place of death back to Burlington and be done with it. 21:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Looks great! NJInce (talk) 22:23, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK
I nominated an article that you wrote for Did you know on the main page - Template:Did you know nominations/Catharine Brant. SL93 (talk) 09:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Catharine Brant
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Blue Sandy Waves


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Blue Sandy Waves, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Iksas moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Iksas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mooonswimmer 21:15, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sequoyah v. Tennessee Valley Authority has been accepted
 Sequoyah v. Tennessee Valley Authority, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Sequoyah_v._Tennessee_Valley_Authority help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 15:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Netotiliztli has been accepted
 Netotiliztli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Netotiliztli help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:57, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)