User talk:NJoy27

Bienvenue!
Bonjour,, et bienvenue sur Wikipédia. Les efforts pour améliorer Wikipédia sont toujours les bienvenus ; malheureusement, vos contributions ne sont pas rédigées dans un anglais suffisamment bon pour être utiles, ou alors ne sont pas rédigées en anglais du tout. Vous semblez être plus familier avec le français. Saviez-vous qu'il existe une Wikipédia en français ? Vous préféreriez peut-être y contribuer. En tout cas, bienvenue sur Wikipedia, et merci pour vos efforts ! Si vous avez besoin d'aide, n'hésitez pas à me contacter sur ma page de discussion. Merci, 2A00:23EE:1118:6445:74FB:36FF:FE35:126F (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CJUE, 26 JUIN 2019, affaire C‑723/17 (March 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bkissin were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CJUE, 26 JUIN 2019, affaire C‑723/17 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:CJUE,_26_JUIN_2019,_affaire_C%E2%80%91723/17 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:CJUE,_26_JUIN_2019,_affaire_C%E2%80%91723/17 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:CJUE, 26 JUIN 2019, affaire C‑723/17


The page Draft:CJUE, 26 JUIN 2019, affaire C‑723/17 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=215512&doclang=fr. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review. — Diannaa (talk) 12:19, 30 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey Diannaa,
 * Thanks for your feedback. However, I thought that décisions made by official judges do not enjoy copyright protection. For example, according to § 5 I UrGH (german law on official works), decisions and officially written guidelines do not enjoy copyright protection. This principle applies to all judgements made in the EU law.
 * I would be pleased to receive an answer.
 * Regards
 * NJoy27 NJoy27 (talk) 21:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The legal notice of the European Union website shows "© European Union, 1995-2023 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated." That's not specific enough for our purposes because it doesn't cover two things our license does allow: derivative works, and commercial use. So it doesn't look like a compatible license to me. — Diannaa (talk) 12:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC)