User talk:NMasiha/‌‌B

Nomination of EveryOne Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EveryOne Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/EveryOne Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 16:18, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Your contributed article, History of Persian music


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, History of Persian music. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Music of Iran. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Music of Iran. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Rye-96 (talk) 16:47, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miresmaeil Sadaghi Assa Hosseini


The article Miresmaeil Sadaghi Assa Hosseini has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Contradictory dates (lede and infobox), no sources found."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kleuske (talk) 10:38, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Philip Luther moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Philip Luther, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources that demonstrate the subject's notability and at the moment it has none. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Miresmaeil Sadaghi Assa Hosseini moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Miresmaeil Sadaghi Assa Hosseini, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 10:19, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Farshid Hakki


A tag has been placed on Farshid Hakki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. M h hossein  talk 11:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alireza Golipour
Hello Nikoo.Amini,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alireza Golipour for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Haft Tappeh Sugar Cane Mill Labor Syndicate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shush ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Haft_Tappeh_Sugar_Cane_Mill_Labor_Syndicate check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Haft_Tappeh_Sugar_Cane_Mill_Labor_Syndicate?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sepideh Gholian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labour ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Sepideh_Gholian check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Sepideh_Gholian?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ali Nejati for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Nejati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ali Nejati until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saff V. (talk) 08:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Philip Luther


Hello, Nikoo.Amini. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philip Luther".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:53, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Please stop
In Wikipedia we rely on sources for inclusion of statements. This does not mean we have to prove their claims in the absolute sense. In other words, as long as a source is approved for being reliable we can use its claim in the article without going after every detail. This is why Wikipedia is different than other encyclopedias. This is why Wikipedia is NOT a reliable source and this is why Wikipedia grew so fast and so big. Anyways, please, kindly read the sources and discuss what you really mean in the talk page before making a blanket revert. Thank you.--Kazemita1 (talk) 13:53, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Nothing in the source say anything about “sexual abbuse”. You are adding incorrect interpretation of the source to this section. You need to be more careful about this. Nikoo.Amini (talk) 14:36, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * This is what source number one says:

Various phases of this “revolution” include: divorce by decree of married couples, regular writings of self-criticism reports, renunciation of sexuality, and absolute mental and physical dedication to the leadership.


 * and this is what source number two says:

Former members consistently describe participating in regular public confessions of their sexual fantasies --Kazemita1 (talk) 15:04, 13 May 2019 (UTC) When someone says a significant number of politicians in the US and UK would say I was tricked and then goes on to saying those politicians are either paid by MEK or are anti the current regime in Tehran, it is very much saying he disagrees with them.--Kazemita1 (talk) 15:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * You appear to make your own interpretation of the sources, and the Human Rights Watch source already include in the section. Also "describe participating in regular public confessions of their sexual fantasies" is controversial claim for human rights abuse. " Please start a discussion in the MEK talk page if you want to include controversial things". Nikoo.Amini (talk) 19:43, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ali Saremi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Saremi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ali Saremi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 00:49, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Help plz
Hi there I need one help, I have edited a page named Wakil Kumar Yadav, but someone has kept it underAfD category. Plz visit the page and remove the AfD template. The page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wakil_Kumar_Yadav Wakuxyz (talk) 19:04, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating Saeed Shirzad.

User:Doomsdayer520 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 16:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. Nikoo.Amini (talk) 21:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

GS notification
Please read the notification I sent you, which you removed here. It doesn't say you did anything wrong. It's a notification that somewhat different rules are operating in an area of Wikipedia that you have shown interest in. It is in your best interest to understand what the notification is trying to say. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:54, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comment which I studied and I believe it can be a good policy, but I am surprised why you have put my name along with those who have violated the Wikipedia rules and  have been harassing me with their disruptive edits. Regards Nikoo.Amini (talk) 22:23, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The notification isn't just sent to disruptive editors. It's given (or should be given) to anyone demonstrating a sustained interest in the topic. The list with your name is just a list of people who have been notified, and who can be sanctioned immediately if they are disruptive. If you edit within policy, then you will never face a sanction. Vanamonde (Talk) 22:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)