User talk:NNU-1-05100211

Welcome!

 * }

Ducun in suzhou
请不要用中文在英文维基百科作出贡献. 您的中文贡献在 中文维基百科 会更受欢迎. 請不要用中文在英文維基百科作出貢獻. 您的中文貢獻在 中文維基百科 會更受歡迎.

Please do not contribute text in Chinese to English Wikipedia. Your contributions are more than welcome at the Chinese Wikipedia. Mbch331 (talk) 09:20, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Ducun
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:28, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Distribution of american black people, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. See our existing article African American. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:56, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, The Lion King 3-D


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, The Lion King 3-D. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - The_Lion_King. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The_Lion_King - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 02:26, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Zhong Qiu Jie
Sorry to say, but your article duplicates Mid-Autumn Festival. Sorry. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I am sorry too; you seem to have spent quite some time on it. I amde a WP:redirect, so the article now points directly to Mid-Autumn Festival. If you want to see the old text, see this history. If you want to discuss a future title, you can ask me at my talk page... Also, for the future, try to stick to facts that you have sources for and keep a more formal tone (not "they indulge in eating mooncakes", just: they eat mooncakes) etc... Good luck! L.tak (talk) 20:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of School Bus Trails in China


The article School Bus Trails in China has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * fails WP:N. Unable to find independent WP:RS with no claims of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michaela den (talk) 11:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Your article
Hello! I appreciate very much how much you are trying to put up articles! Your recent article Ming_and_Qing_Dynasties_palace_garden_scenic_area, however, is difficult to understand. Is this in Guangzhou? Hong Kong? What about East Hollywood? It looks to me like maybe you didn't translate this yourself, but used software. The result is that it is not very clear where or what the article is about. Why don't you move it to your sandbox, and try to put it in your own words? If you need help, try the QQ system. You'll achieve better results if you describe the subject in your own words. It doesn't have to be very long to begin with. Njnu-ban-xueshenghao (talk) 11:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear user! It is now 1 week further, so I also took a look at your article. It still is not up to wikipedia standards. You need links (this is how you make a link to a bear, just click edit to see how I did it), and references from RS|reliable sources. You use "our", which is not encyclopedic, and chinese acres (which should be translated to square meters, or hectares). Furhtermore, there are some unclear things: what is "East Hollywood"? most people don't know. And the Hongkong part? And this sentence I completely don't understand:

Anyway, I don't want to discourage you but to stimulate you to work onthe article and improve it! L.tak (talk) 19:55, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The entire scenic area governs the base of the Guangzhou Hong Kong Film and television, the gun battle piece to photograph, the screen crag cave mansion, the rope way sightseeing cable car, the Asian biggest high tech movie studio and so on some other big scenic areas

Speedy deletion of "Thing-i-Verse"
A page you created, Thing-i-Verse, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a website, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for websites in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Deadly&forall;ssassin 09:59, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

ping
sonia ♫ 10:25, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Sensation-seeker
Hello. Thanks for your article Sensation-seeker. Unfortunately it duplicates the material and subject of an existing article. I have redirected it to Impulsivity. If you wish to add to the Impulsivity article, make sure that any information you add is well-referenced to a reliable published source. Best wishes and happy editing, Voceditenore (talk) 09:25, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Overseas-Lingering Grads


The article Overseas-Lingering Grads has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 09:00, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Blind date lie


A tag has been placed on Blind date lie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vrenator    talk   12:06, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bromeo


The article Bromeo has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Appears to be original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 12:18, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bromeo


A tag has been placed on Bromeo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 12:23, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blind date lie


The article Blind date lie has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence that this concept has received the sort of coverage needed for Wikipedia's notability requirements.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)