User talk:NOLA1982

Welcome!
Hello, NOLA1982, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 15:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ebertfest: Roger Ebert's Film Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albert Parker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Bullying on the Nina Paley Article
You have jumped to reverting edits that you have no basis to revert and made this article about you bullying other. Nina Paley has done no work as a gender critical feminist. None. She is a trans exclusionary radical feminist. She discussed that in the TERFING. Her only discussion of gender are that she says transgender people are only the biological sex and not the gender they identify as. Her sources say that OUTRIGHT! She can call herself whatever she chooses. the same way she claims that transgender can but her identity is as a TERF and nothing more. 104.34.202.79 (talk) 19:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks!
I've spelled Mississippi correctly for most of my life; I appreciate your help in getting it right this week! Thanks! Jacona (talk) 14:59, 13 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Cheers! There are a lot of Ss in that state name, so no worries. Interesting work that you are doing. Thanks for your thanks. NOLA1982 (talk) 17:30, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Radical Harmonies) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Radical Harmonies.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 12:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Inez Catalon
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

WP:ALUMNI does not require material in embedded lists to have an article
In a recent edit summary, you wrote that "notability requires a WP article, per WP:ALUMNI." I just wanted to let you know that the advice article you cited does not actually say that and material included in embedded lists does not have to meet our standards for notability. Specifically, our current guideline says: "Inclusion in lists contained within articles should be determined by WP:SOURCELIST, in that the entries must have the same importance to the subject as would be required for the entry to be included in the text of the article according to Wikipedia policies and guidelines (including Trivia sections)."

The specific edit you made is still totally fine as the material was also unsourced and that is almost always an acceptable reason to delete material so no worries about having to go back to that article and make changes or revert your edit! This is just a friendly note about a policy that has been commonly understood differently by some editors (and I think it was slightly changed at some point to try to make it more clear). ElKevbo (talk) 19:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK for I've Heard the Mermaids Singing
—valereee (talk) 12:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Love for Sale FAC
Hi. I saw your name in my edit watchlist (Gaucho) and wanted to ask if you could comment on or review my FAC for Love for Sale (Bilal album). It is a not a long article, but the review has become a sprawling mess with ambiguous or reluctant takes on the sourcing in particular, and no new comments have been made in a week or so. So any thoughts would be welcome. Thank you. isento (talk) 20:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Greetings, isento. Thank you for the invitation to participate in the FAC discussion. I'm flattered that you think I might have something to add to the discussion, but I intentionally do not get involved in those kinds of WP activities. Best wishes for your campaign, however. It's an interesting article. NOLA1982 (talk) 17:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the source
I appreciate that you found it, and proved the date is in October. Thank you. Ebbedlila (talk) 22:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrol
Hi. Just came across your excellent Make it Funky article in the new page queue. Have you considered requesting autopatrol? You are way beyond eligible! JSFarman (talk) 20:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you JSFarman for your comments and review of my new article Make It Funky. I am not familiar with autopatrol, but I will check it out. NOLA1982 (talk) 20:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi NOLA1982, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3ANOLA1982 added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!  Schwede 66  22:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


 * A belated thank you, Schwede66. NOLA1982 (talk) 02:32, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello NOLA1982
I am a fellow Wikipedian (since late December 2019). My interest is N.O. musicians who I think deserve either more information on their existing Wikipages or their own Wikipages. A few bio bits about me- Oystershell Alliance, WWOZ, UNO communications. Your privacy is of utmost importance to me. Please visit my user page. Signed, Rudypoo 26 March 2022

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Matthew Shepard Article Sourcing
Hey, just want to explain my motivation for those citation edits on the Matthew Shepard article. The author of that source is a notable anti-LGBT journalist, so I worry that it might have excessive bias. Would it work better if I found another source with the same information? ChekhovsGunman (talk) 18:19, 10 March 2023 (UTC)


 * When I undid your @ChekhovsGunman original edits, it was based on comparing your edit summary with the article content and edit history. At that time, I skimmed The Guardian article but had not read the entire work. And I had no previous knowledge about the author of The Guardian piece. Since then, I have read both. I don't claim to be an expert on this topic, but I did once made a public presentation about it, which required a fair amount of research. In my humble opinion, The Guardian article is not an opinion piece and the facts presented mesh with almost everything I have read about the case. The author appears to be controversial because of comments she has made about transgender issues in general and because she did not disagree with conclusions in the controversial book The Book of Matt by Jimenez. The Shepard article has a section about that book, with refs in support of both sides of the controversy. If you want to add additional references to support the claims, that would fit with the WP policy of Neutral point of view.
 * That said, I try to stay out of discussions about WP controversies. If you want other opinions about this particular article, you should post your query to the Shepard article talk page. Thanks. NOLA1982 (talk) 02:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Unblock request

 * Not sure what the underlying problem was, but the issue was resolved as of April 18, 2023. NOLA1982 (talk) 04:17, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

João Grande
Hi. Regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jo%C3%A3o_Grande&oldid=prev&diff=1173336684, João Grande is not his name. So I am not sure if DEFAULTSORT make sense. --Mladifilozof (talk) 21:52, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello again and Judith Hill
Hi. I just deleted "harp" from the "instruments" field on Judith Hill -- I can't find a reference. (I have been following her since Michael Jackson died and have never seen her with a harp!) Please revert if I am mistaken. Thanks and hope you are well! Julie JSFarman (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you, Julie. I don't have a problem with your edit. I don't claim to be an expert on Hill, but harp does seem a bit far-fetched. If you can't find a ref, I believe you. Be well! NOLA1982 (talk) 21:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

PJ Hirabayashi
hi NOLA1982, I see you've deleted the Further Reading section for PJ Hirabayashi because the book listed is used as a source for citations. The article in the book has much much more than the wiki page on this musician and is an excellent source for finding out more. It does also verify much of the info in the page that was not cited. Please return the Further Reading section. I don't want to undo what you have done, but rather want to point interested persons to an excellent source on Hirabayashi. Thank you, Surefirebrand
 * Greetings, Surefirebrand. Thank you for discussing rather than reverting on this topic. I don't necessarily agree with you in this case, because the WP:Further reading documentation states "In articles with very many footnotes, it may not be obvious which references are suitable for further reading, and such entries may be selectively duplicated in Further reading". At this time, the PJ article has only 11 citations and the book is ref number 1. But I won't edit war with you over this, so feel free to undo my prior actions if you wish. Thanks. NOLA1982 (talk) 17:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * IMHO, what would be terrific for the quality of the article is for you to add inline refs from the book to the claims in the article that are not currently supported with a WP:RS. NOLA1982 (talk) 17:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)