User talk:NPFan17

Voting order
Where have you got the information to verify the voting order you inserted in this edit? Wikipedia has a strict policy on sourcing content. For now I shall revert the edit, until a citation is found to validate the change.  Wes Wolf Talk 14:16, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2017, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''"Joking!" and self-reverting is not an appropriate reason to vandalize an article.''  Tuxipεdia ( talk ) 01:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Seriousness
Edits like this one are not a laughing matter. Wikipedia takes things serious. If you wish to joke around, then Wikipedia is not the place for doing that. Everyone is expected to collaborate in a constructive manner. Be more careful in future, as we wouldn't want you receiving a block from further editing.  Wes Wolf Talk 01:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism
Making edits like this, and creating fake sources like this one is still an act of vandalism. If you continue to conduct this sort of behaviour, you run the risk of being blocked indefinitely. Consider this as your final warning, as any future edits of the same nature will be reported without fail and your account blocked immediately.  Wes Wolf Talk 22:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2017. I have just warned you about vandalism, you leave me with no other choice but to have your account reported as a vandalism-only user.  Wes Wolf Talk 22:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at 2017–18 World Rugby Sevens Series shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Wes Wolf Talk 23:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

2017–18 World Rugby Sevens Series listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2017–18 World Rugby Sevens Series. Since you had some involvement with the 2017–18 World Rugby Sevens Series redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  Wes Wolf Talk 23:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 Wes Wolf Talk 23:45, 24 May 2017 (UTC)