User talk:NPrice/Archive 1

Welcome!

 * }

Orphaned non-free image File:Manley Labs Logo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Manley Labs Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Rethink
This was awfully rude ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 20:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Apologies, that was intended to be taken in a joking-sarcastic manner, but upon re-reading, I can see how harsh it sounds. nprice (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * You had a chance to fix it - you didn't, I have now deleted the page. Insulting/attacking people's language skills is WP:CIVIL inappropriate, especially inside their article drafts. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:27, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

ANI Notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The Cavalry (Message me) 22:10, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

 * I'm not going to review this, having already found this user insulting/attacking at least one editor on Wikipedia since his return. I'm not sure how anyone can claim "oh, I forgot I had an account", and I'm not sure how Zscout370's suggestion has merit - he's a Commons admin, but I do not believe he's an en.Wikipedia admin. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:33, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * is an admin here (his home wiki), as well as a global admin - as is shown here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:30, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Let's not forget that the person behind NPrice also operated Dominotree - and that account was itself blocked for being a 'GNAA troll sockpuppet'. My recent discussion with him on IRC also contradicts what he said to Zscout370 on IRC. I'd be happy to accept a CLEANSTART here, but given that he went straight back to the original subject of his editing, and that he was previously blocked for socking, and the insulting edits listed at Special:DeletedContributions/NPrice, I don't think CLEANSTART applies really. The Cavalry (Message me) 13:44, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * That's the point, you banned me BECAUSE that account was banned, and now your argument is "Oh, look! His other account was banned too, so this ban is valid!" - it's circular logic.  Furthermore, at this point, I think you've participated in many more GNAA-related discussions and whatnot than I have, and is there something wrong with doing so?  It's a reason I'm here, true, but it's far from the only one.  The previous ban was for trolling, not sockpuppeting (there is no other account that was associated with that one, besides this new one, that I am aware of), so saying I was previously banned for sockpuppeting is inaccurate.  I've done nothing recently to warrant a permanent ban other than simply being here.  Also, you can refer to me by my name, you have all my information and you sent me photos of myself you sleuthed up online (I suppose in an attempt to either scare me or to show off).  You don't need to call me "the person behind NPrice".  nprice (talk) 16:14, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * what insulting edits? On one occasion he critiqued an article writer's English skills. If he was an established member of the community we'd just be sending him to become a reviewer at WP:FAC. Everything else is certainly enough to justify an indefinite block, so there's no need to rely on hokum and bunkum-themed evidence to seal the deal. Ironholds (talk) 15:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Please specify what "Everything else" is nprice (talk) 16:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see examples of any edits other than the single one previously mentioned which could be deemed "unconstructive". Sometimes my sarcasm level can be a bit high, but I haven't done anything to damage the encyclopedia or its articles.  Were this account taken on its own merits, it certainly would not have earned a permanent ban, and even if CLEANSTART had applied, there'd be no reason for a permanent block.  nprice (talk) 16:22, 26 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I no longer have access to said account, how would I go about doing so? nprice (talk) 19:04, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I found the password. nprice (talk) 19:13, 26 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Can you please cite more than a single unconstructive edit? I doubt it.  As is typical, you've viewed my contribution history, noted the subject matter, and immediately assumed it was invalid without actually looking at any of it.  The block reason is now totally irrelevant, and I was not blocked for being "unconstructive", as you claim.  Nobody has been able to cite me being "unconstructive", besides a single deleted edit, anyhow.  nprice (talk) 14:05, 27 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment: I did notice (del/undel) 03:05, 27 July 2011 Daniel Case (talk | contribs | block) unblocked "Dominotree (talk | contribs)" ‎ (user has started a new account; wants to clear things up here). Is there newer consensus to ban and is this block still applicable? -- slakr \ talk / 16:13, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I got that cleared up per Ronhjones when he closed the previous unblock request, and said "The normal advice in these cases is to go back to your old account and get that unblocked first. If that gets unblocked then you may mark that account as retired and do a WP:CLEANSTART if you so desire." - As that reads to me, I've followed his instructions to be unblocked here. nprice (talk) 16:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow. Just wow.  My NPrice account was blocked because my old Dominotree account was blocked.  I took the steps I was told to get Dominotree unblocked, and now the admin who unblocked Dominotree saw that this account had been blocked, and reblocked Dominotree.  NPrice is blocked because Dominotree is blocked, and Dominotree is blocked because NPrice is blocked.  This is ridiculous, can't anyone step up and fix this?  nprice (talk) 03:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * And a simple request. If you're gonna say that I am being unconstructive, or that I'm exhibiting past behaviors, please cite some edits that prove a pattern of this.  I was previously banned for trolling, and aside from a single removed edit, it's clear that it's not going on anymore.  Again, I've done nothing unconstructive, and nothing that warrants a ban.  I am just stuck in a catch-22 while certain admins chase their tails trying to keep me banned for no reason.  nprice (talk) 04:22, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Let's go over this again. I was blocked not for ANY actions of this account, only because my previous account was blocked in 2006 and I'd forgotten.  I got that account unblocked and retired it, requested an unblock, during which time people said I was being unconstructive, without being able to cite anything.  Because *somehow* those baseless opinions factor into this, I remained banned, and the administrator who'd unbanned my previous account was informed (in a very biased manner) that my unblock request for this account was denied, and then was suggested that he re-ban my previous account (likely just as an excuse to deny a legitimate unblock request from this account).  If I'd gotten the previous account dealt with first, I'd never have earned a ban on this account.  Now, because I got the order wrong, I'm still banned, for no good reason.  nprice (talk) 04:38, 28 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The account was blocked in 2004 for being a GNAA sleeper account. In 2006 the block was briefly lifted, but then reinstated on the groups that checkuser had found that it was a GNAA troll account. In 2011 you return having conveniently forgotten that you already had an account and then make mainly GNAA related edits (for instance, your first edit with this account was for the DRV for Gay Nigger Association of America: ). The pattern is pretty clear. Note that attacking admins isn't going to get the block lifted. Nick-D (talk) 07:49, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

NPrice, regardless of "the order of things", the primary issue is clearly the pattern of editing. As it seems to be the area that gets you and others into trouble, are you willing to accept a 1-year topic ban from GNAA (broadly construed), including related talkpages? ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 10:55, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * As I've stated several times, on this talk page, yes. nprice (talk) 13:48, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * In fact, I stated so in my last unblock request, had anyone actually read it. nprice (talk) 17:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Unblocked
This serves as public notice that NPrice has been unblocked following an appeal on IRC in the #wikipedia-en-unblock channel. With the consent of User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, who has been asked to confirm his consent here, NPrice has agreed to the following restrictions regarding his editing, which we believe will resolve the majority of the concerns raised above. If anyone has any questions regarding this action, please contact me for a log of the discussion in the unblock channel. Public logging of this channel is permitted for this purpose. To NPrice, thank you for your cooperation, and happy editing. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 20:15, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * NPrice is subject to a topic ban, covering all namespaces, in which he may not involve himself in editing or discussion of topics related to the Gay Nigger Association of America, broadly construed. This topic ban is of indefinite length.
 * Violations of the above topic ban, as determined by any uninvolved administrator, will result in an immediate block of a minimum of one week in duration. Blocks may be extended up to indefinite length for repeated or particularly egregious violations.
 * After a period of one year, NPrice may, having demonstrated constructive efforts to improve the encyclopedia elsewhere, appeal this topic ban on the Administrator's noticeboard. The topic ban may then be lifted with the consensus of the community.
 * I can confirm that the above discussion took place as Hersfold described. NPrice was very polite, and addressed all the issues raised honestly and courteously. I would also note that the ban includes "but is not limited to, topics such as ANUS [American Nihilist Underground Society], Goatse Security, people affiliated with those topics, etc. That said, I think we have a constructive user here - NPrice, feel free to come to me for any questions/problems you have. No hard feelings, I hope! The Cavalry (Message me) 20:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! nprice (talk) 17:07, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

A free barnstar!
--Zalgo (talk) 23:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! It did seem like a bit of a war.  nprice (talk) 23:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Rollback
After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you do not want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Happy editing!  Malinaccier ( talk ) 23:36, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback may be removed at any time.

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, I noticed we've been colliding on rollbacks tonight :P nprice (talk) 01:13, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Recent vandal
The editor you just warned, User:MrMinority, vandlized Rolling Papers (album) again. Does this warrant a block? Dan56 (talk) 01:28, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Check his edit logs, I think he's been at it for a while. nprice (talk) 01:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Revert?
Hi, just wondering why I received a warning for my edit on the Virginia Page. I was simply reverting an earlier edit with the text "Virginia is Gay" and did not intentionally make an unconstructive edit If this is indeed the case, I assure you the edit was Made in good faith. Tarheel95 (Sprechen) 03:44, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * My apologies, I was trying a new anti-vandalism tool and in certain cases, if the timing is right, it will let me rollback a page after a legitimate user already fixed it, putting the vandalism back and adding a warning to the legitimate user's page. I'd done that a couple times tonight and figured out how to avoid it, I must've missed it when I accidentally rolled your edit back.  Anyways, just pretend I didn't do it :)  nprice (talk) 03:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, it happens to all of us.Tarheel95 (Sprechen) 03:49, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Kick-Ass 2, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Sadism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:47, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

barnstar for youuu :D

 * Thanks! I try :P  nprice (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

block ip adress 178.99.165.176?
can you block him? He seems to ruin and edit every bodys work. All the time. And his language is very bad to,. ^^David-golota (talk) 23:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I am not an administrator, but my rollback tool automatically reports him to AIV after four warnings. nprice (talk) 23:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. I mean. Look at his language and how he speaks to peolpe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/178.99.165.176

David-golota —Preceding undated comment added 23:40, 8 December 2011 (UTC).
 * This looks like something you should work out and fix on the articles' talk pages, rather than starting an edit war and possibly getting blocked. nprice (talk) 17:04, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Block David-golota
I am sick of correcting his, and other peoples' mistakes and errors, and then having David-golota undo my corrections. He's a nuisance. His English is terrible and he clearly has little knowledge of the subject (boxing). He's obviously also trying to promote a bogus sanctioning body (IBO). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.99.165.176 (talk) 23:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * This looks like something you should work out and fix on the articles' talk pages, rather than starting an edit war and possibly getting blocked. nprice (talk) 17:05, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

You dont ever want to discuss things with me. You are the one who keeps calling people names and you are using bad language against me and others. And your edits are correct. But you dont need to delete facts. You are the only one having problems with the Vitali Klitschko page as it was before. Grow up., — Preceding unsigned comment added by David-golota (talk • contribs) 23:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * This looks like something you should work out and fix on the articles' talk pages, rather than starting an edit war and possibly getting blocked. nprice (talk) 17:05, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pug, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=465007292 here]. Edinburgh  Wanderer  20:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I know misfires happen with igloo, but please take your time before you hit the "revert" button and don't immediately hit "continue" if it notices the page has already been fixed. Thanks!  nprice (talk) 20:11, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It automatically stops if a change has already been made so you don't click continue for anything. For some reason that failed. Edinburgh   Wanderer  20:23, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, I've done it a few times, but it was me immediately clicking "Continue" first. nprice (talk) 20:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe thats what ive done sorry anyway. Edinburgh   Wanderer  20:26, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries! nprice (talk) 20:27, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

I think it misfired again. I've explained the edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.97.68.89 (talk) 20:20, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Those particular edits I rolled-back were POV-laden and removed properly-sourced material for unsourced material. For changes like that, please use the article's Talk page first.  nprice (talk) 20:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! I try to be quick!  nprice (talk) 20:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Speed is virtuous, but accuracy more so. And there are various WP:assume good faith and otehr hints worth perusing.  Midgley (talk) 04:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Nice jab there, buddy. Mythpage88 (talk) 18:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh wow, didn't realize he'd also commented up here, on me thanking someone for a Barnstar. Glad he's got so much time for constructive editing.  nprice (talk) 18:49, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, this is a lot more fun than playing puzzle games! nprice (talk) 21:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Rock Hudson
Why did you remove my edit of the Rock Hudson page including him in the "Gay Actors" section?
 * Sorry, it was an accident, I undid my changes. nprice (talk) 03:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Midgley&diff=cur
That was I think around the 7000th edit I've made to WP, thank you for welcoming me to the project. One of the articles I started was that on Margaret Gelling PhD, sometime president of the British Placename Society, and author as referenced in the note. If you are trying to navigate around England (and particularly if you were a Celt prior to displacement by the Saxons and whatnots) you would be helped in doing so if you knew that a Coombe is a particular shaped scoop out of the side of a hill. Our ancestors had many names for hill, whcih again, before the advent of GPS, writing and maps gave a useful way of describing a route. It is still useful, actually, you can see the Coombe near Taunton and pick the right road. I think you are wholly wrong to describe that edit as vandalism, although by all means find a different way of noting the connection between geopgraphy and placename there, and please l;et me know what you have decided is better. Midgley (talk) 04:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting I see in December 2004. Perhaps I should welcome you to the project?  Welcome.  Midgley (talk) 04:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The manner in which you phrased your edit made it sound as if you were attempting to add a joke or humor (which would obviously be inappropriate for encyclopedic content) to the article. I can now see that you were not vandalizing the article, so I apologize for the revert/notice.  You also might want to consider citing content you add to Wikipedia (this *is* an encyclopedia, after all, someone who's been here as long as you have should be aware of those requirements.)  I'd suggest rephrasing it somehow and re-adding it, along with a proper citation so it doesn't appear to be original research.  I have no qualms with it as long as it is a legitimate edit and not intended as humor.  Also, I get it, you've been here a few months longer than I have.  I don't see how it's relevant.  nprice (talk) 04:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I suggest that since you recognise your edit was a mistake, and that your rapid pasting of a warning about vandalism was also in error, you make the correction - reverting your reversion. I accept your apology.  By all means delete your addition to my talk page.  I'd suggest if you are unsure about the place of an edit, the talk page for the article is actually a better place to mention it.  WP is not American (there is probably a WP:NOT_AMERICAN page somewhere.  WHat may appear as humor to one person, may not be intended as humour by an Englishman.  A few, round here, tends to mean a single digit number, but that also may vary from continent to continent.  Midgley (talk) 04:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Cite a source (saying something is "clear" or "obvious" doesn't count on Wikipedia) and calm down. It's not a big deal, and please, feel free to do what you will to your own pages and articles.  I still personally believe your edit has no place on the page as-is, however.  The notice/warning was quick, indeed, because I use an automated tool to revert vandalism, that way users such as yourself have more free time to harangue me about removing an unsourced quip they wrote.  If you want to revert the article, feel free to do it yourself, and increment that huge 7000 edit count you've amassed over all this time.  nprice (talk) 05:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * "Quip"? Why? Doesn't look like one to me. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Well it does to me, but either way, "Clearly" or "Obviously" are not the same as sourcing a statement. I already apologized for the mis-revert, explained why it happened, and said to edit as he pleases.  I thought this was over.  I have no qualms with the article as it currently exists.  Is Midgley (talk) getting other people involved in this non-event after-the-fact? nprice (talk) 16:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

User:72.192.112.131
This user has continued vandalism. On Nintendo 64 page, they replaced the proper top selling game with an incorrect one. I have reverted it and I have sent them another warning on their talk page. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 23:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
For reverting the vandalism on my talk page! Jim1138 (talk) 08:31, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem! nprice (talk) 09:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Black Mirror (TV Series)
Please could you put some comments on Talk:Black Mirror (TV series) indicating why you think it is a copyright violation?

I'll wait a week or so, then if I hear nothing, remove the banner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ukslim (talk • contribs) 11:21, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Replying in both places - at the time that I added that tag last year, every episode description had been directly copied and pasted from another website. This appears to no longer be the case.  Yes hello, nprice (was) here. (talk) 14:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

School Slang
Hiya NPrice, I've removed your db-nonsense since the material in this article is easily understandable. I've asked that it be IAR-deleted (plus it's semi-attack-ish), but it definitely isn't complete gibberish. Thanks,  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  02:19, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that was probably what I should've done from the start :P yes hello, nprice (was) here. (talk) 02:39, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Advertising and spam link on Russian banya
Hi, Glade that you came on that page. I'm living in Russia for the last 3 yeas, i have huge knoledge about Russian traditions, etc ...I travel a lot in Rusia, and i contribut in different russian articles. Please have a look on those links ! ARE PURE SPAM -ADVERTISING ! Thx and have a nice day !

Vandalism
What is the link that you told me that it is vandalism? --FreshBeatJimmyNeutron (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Your edits so far appear promotional in nature, and the YouTube link you keep spamming is just roundabout link-farming for some online rugby store. yes hello, nprice (was) here. (talk) 02:55, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

A BARNSTAR FOR YOU!

 * Thanks! yes hello, nprice (was) here. (talk) 15:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism Warning.
Please be careful when handing out vandalism warnings :-) Thank you for fixing it so quickly <3 ♥ Solarra ♥  ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 02:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, bit of a misfire :P yes hello, nprice (was) here. (talk) 02:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! yes hello, nprice (was) here. (talk) 02:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Hey, good work tonight! Mark Arsten (talk) 06:00, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Copyvio
Hi NPrince,

I've removed copyright and all right reserved text. I am requesting you to please review our page again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amrishtyagi (talk • contribs) 18:03, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I have reverted back to your version of the page, however, there are additional issues with it, which I have tagged at the top. Thanks!  yes hello, nprice (was) here. (talk) 18:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi NPrince,

Can we add Google Analytics code in our page?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amrishtyagi (talk • contribs) 13:58, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Do not worry, you are not in trouble. -- J (t)  00:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Batman the dark knight rises my theory`s
You may want to see this article. If it is deleted before you get a chance, it is talking about the deletion of the article which previously had this title and claimed it was written by you. This new article was written by User:Bart simpson rules. RichardOSmith (talk) 21:34, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I submitted the article for deletion myself, and provided a reason why it should be deleted. Someone is confused.  yes hello, nprice (was) here. (talk) 21:36, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Indeed. It is very odd. So much so, I have raised it at WP:AN/I. RichardOSmith (talk) 21:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

DDR
I just posted on DDR Motorsport what is true facts and the public should be made aware. They try to perpetrate that they are a legitamate company but they are being sued. Please resubmit the factual entries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DDRLawsuit (talk • contribs) 07:01, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Your username is in violation of Wikipedia policy, and your edits have no reliable sources. Find a reliable source (such as a news organization) instead of simply adding links to your own website.  yes hello, nprice (was) here. (talk) 07:04, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Huggle 3
Hey NPrice! I am Petrb, one of core developers of Huggle, the antivandalism tool, which you are beta testing (according to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers). I am happy to announce that Huggle 3 is ready for some testing. You can read more about it at WP:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta. Please keep in mind that this is a development version and it is not ready for regular use. That means you must:


 * Watch your contribs - when anything happens you didn't want, fix it and report a bug
 * Frequently checkout source code and build latest version, we change it a lot

If you find any problem with a feature that is supposed to work perfectly, please let us know. Some features are not ready yet, it is listed in known problems on Huggle3 beta page, you don't need to report these - we know it! So, that's it. Have fun testing and please let us know about any problems, either using bugzilla @ http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/ or. Please respond to my talk page, I am not going to watch your talk page. Thank you Petrb (talk) 10:57, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Huggle 3
Hey NPrice! I am Petrb, one of core developers of Huggle, the antivandalism tool, which you are beta testing (according to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers). I am happy to announce that Huggle 3 is ready for some testing. You can read more about it at WP:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta. Please keep in mind that this is a development version and it is not ready for regular use. That means you must:


 * Watch your contribs - when anything happens you didn't want, fix it and report a bug
 * Frequently checkout source code and build latest version, we change it a lot

If you find any problem with a feature that is supposed to work perfectly, please let us know. Some features are not ready yet, it is listed in known problems on Huggle3 beta page, you don't need to report these - we know it! So, that's it. Have fun testing and please let us know about any problems, either using bugzilla @ http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/ or. Please respond to my talk page, I am not going to watch your talk page. Thank you Petrb (talk) 10:57, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Huggle 3 beta is out - and we need more feedback!
Hey NPrice, how are you? I am Petrb, one of huggle developers, and you are currently subscribed as a beta tester of huggle on meta (Huggle/Members. You may not have noticed, but this week I released first beta precompiled installers for ubuntu and microsoft windows! Huggle/Huggle3_Beta has all the links you need. So if you can, please download it, test it and report all bugs that is really what we need now. Don't forgot that as it's just a beta it's unstable and there are some known issues. Be carefull! Thank you for helping us with huggle Petrb (talk) 16:23, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

We need your help testing latest huggle
Hello,

I am sending you this message because you listed yourself on Huggle/Members as a beta tester. We desperately need attention of testers, because since we resolved all release blockers, we are ready to release first official version of huggle 3! Before that happens, it would be nice if you could test it so that we can make sure there are no issues with it. You can download it packaged for your operating system (see Huggle/Huggle3_Beta) or you can of course build it yourself, see https://github.com/huggle/huggle3-qt-lx for that. Don't forget to use always latest version, there is no auto-update message for beta versions!

Should you find any issue, please report it to wikimedia bugzilla, that is a central place for huggle bugs, where we look at them. That is i mportant, if you find a bug and won't report it, we can't fix it. Thank you for your work on this, if you have any questions, please send me a message on my talk page, I won't be looking for responses here. Thanks, Petrb (talk) 15:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)