User talk:NPrice9520/sandbox/Breton Gospel Book (British Library, MS Egerton 609)

In terms of leading the article you could try starting with a Description or Overview, unless Historical Context is the main topic of focus for the manuscript. This would help flow better with the information that appears to be available for this manuscript. Structure wise, I feel the Provenance and Content section is very strong and if you added the information regarding the additional terms you wrote within these section it would seem near complete. I feel like like a Symbolism section should be added or something that is related to the religious context and that the Text Script section could be added to Description.

The 'Books' section that continues to the end of the page looks extensive like there was a lot of reliable research done, but I feel like there should be a large cumulative References section instead. The links on the bottom all go to images and descriptions of single folio pages for the manuscript but not a 'root' page you can link to for the manuscript which is unfortunate. To possibly solve this I would still use these links, like in a Link section on the bottom after References and maybe try to incorporate these links in the description/throughout the article. Add the remaining unused links of the pages to the bottom in a Links section. If you are having trouble finding images you can use try using Wikipedia's image search to find your specific manuscript if possible. Overall I think the content so far is well-researched and presented very neutrally.

Moorec SacState (talk) 20:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)