User talk:NSHT IAFHQ

June 2023
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Unified Payments Interface, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   09:15, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at BrahMos, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Pinaka multi-barrel rocket launcher, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. ''Multiple instances on disruptive editing and vandalism, along with uncited additions were seen in your edits. Kindly be careful in the future.'' The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:19, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! NM 00:34, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NM 04:52, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hi NSHT IAFHQ! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. NM 22:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Meaning Country's Flag Not Allowed Right ?? This is Very important info for Public To Know in Which Countries it is used. Don't Delete or Remove. Kindly Remove Edit Restrictions from My Account. Thank You NSHT IAFHQ (talk) 22:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * To summarize:
 * we generally don’t add flags to infoboxes per MOS:INFOBOXFLAGS
 * infoboxes should be succinct per MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE
 * contents must be backed by reliable sources, which you have not provided one in your edits
 * repeatedly adding the icon list back (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) is edit warring.
 * User:SunDawn has already advised you to move the market information to the main article text along with a source, which I agree.
 * If you disagree, please use the article talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. NM
 * If you disagree, please use the article talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. NM
 * If you disagree, please use the article talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. NM

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. NM 17:13, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Do not add the list to the infobox again. This is your last warning. If you want the list in the article, find a reliable source first, then add it to the main article. NM 17:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Andaman and Nicobar Islands have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. The Banner talk 17:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * What Are You Okay ??? NSHT IAFHQ (talk) 17:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Andaman and Nicobar Islands shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Banner talk 17:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * This is important info With Source. Why Removed ??? NSHT IAFHQ (talk) 17:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Your copy-and-paste text was not sourced at all. The Banner  talk 17:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello This is Not Souce " https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andaman_and_Nicobar_Command#:~:text=The%20Andaman%20and%20Nicobar%20Command,a%20Union%20Territory%20of%20India " ???? NSHT IAFHQ (talk) 17:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/why-are-andaman-and-nicobar-islands-a-key-indian-military-asset-101674528554860.html ???? NSHT IAFHQ (talk) 17:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Indeed, what you dumped in the article was not sourced at all. By the way, the information is already in the article. The Banner  talk 17:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * So can I edit and bring out specific information in Para 1 ??? NSHT IAFHQ (talk) 18:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Why should you add info that is already in the article? The Banner  <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 18:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * ReLocate ??? NSHT IAFHQ (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It is good enough where it is. Did you see it yet? The Banner  <i style="color:maroon">talk</i>

Andaman and Nicobar Command
What is your preoccupation with Andaman and Nicobar Command that you try to push it higher in the lead? It is there, so no need to push it higher. The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 09:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)